The 'rationally irresistible' rise of Jos Buttler, T20 opener

Ed Smith, former England selector, on the logic of promoting the format’s game-changing players

Matt Roller20-Oct-2022Jos Buttler will open the batting for England against Afghanistan in Perth on Saturday, as he has in his last 36 T20 internationals dating back to 2018. The debate about his best role in the side, which once provided the backdrop to every T20I series England played, ended a long time ago.But the fundamental question underpinning that discussion is one that captains, coaches, analysts and strategists consider every time they pick a T20 team or squad: should your best player bat in the most difficult position, or the one that allows them to face the most balls?Ed Smith, England’s selector between 2018 and 2021, has a clear view. “T20 cricket is a game of restrictions,” he writes in his new book, . “This is fundamental to understanding T20. Your best bowler is capped at using one-fifth of your resources. Your best batter is free to dominate the whole innings.”Smith was instrumental in England’s decision to promote Buttler to open the batting in T20 internationals in June 2018, two months after his appointment and a matter of weeks after recalling him to the Test team. He had done so once before, against Sri Lanka in 2016, and had spent the previous two IPL seasons opening: first for Mumbai Indians, then for Rajasthan Royals.He had been hugely successful in that role, making five half-centuries in six innings at the top of the order in the 2018 season, but it was not an obvious call. England had an established T20 opening pair in Alex Hales and Jason Roy, and promoting Buttler meant Hales was pushed down into the middle order. That forced Joe Root down the order in turn, and eventually out of the side altogether.Smith tells ESPNcricinfo: “I always used to think that if you took England’s 50-over team and the match was shortened to a T20 for whatever reason, that surely England would become more likely to win because of the destructive batsmanship in that side. And yet, we were ranked much higher in ODIs than in T20s. Therefore, I thought that potentially, we could set up in a more attacking way.”The danger,” he adds, “is that if you have remarkable batters down the order, they don’t get a chance to shape the game. It seems to me a shame when a player is limited to a very small proportion of the match that they can influence, if you believe that player is an outlier or exceptional.”Ed Smith describes T20 cricket as a ‘game of restrictions’ in his new book•PA Images/GettySmith put Buttler in that category. “The batting order in T20 is probably of the same level of significance [as selection] itself,” he argues. “Because you are effectively selecting which player has the potential to face which proportion of the total allocation of balls.”It’s effectively the size of the bet you’re making: if you’re asking someone to open the batting, you’re obviously making a larger bet on their potential to influence the game.” England went all-in on Buttler and doubled their money: since 2018, he averages 46.71 and strikes at 153.53 as a T20I opener.”It’s important to stress,” Smith adds, “that I always believe the captain should decide the batting order. Technically, that decision resided with Eoin [Morgan], as it should do. But if you want to know what I argued then – and would argue now – then yes, I think Jos Buttler should open the batting for England.”The other facet of Smith’s argument was technical, not tactical. “At the beginning of T20 in 2003, there was a school of thought that a T20 team would be ten bowling allrounders, who slog it a long way and a wicketkeeper. Well, we all know that isn’t the way it worked out: actually, brilliant batsmanship has been elevated by T20.”When I look at the very, very best white-ball opening batsmen, I see a pattern in their play: low-risk off-side touch play, combined with selective, on-side power-hitting. It’s like Damien Martyn through the off side and then Andre Russell over long-on. Of course, what we’re describing looks quite a lot like Jos Buttler and Rohit Sharma.”They have that ability to hit good balls through the off-side field, playing relatively low-risk shots – and the fielding restrictions mean there are always gaps on the off side in the first six overs – and then when there’s a mismatch, they have the potential to hit 22 or 24 runs off an over, playing higher-risk shots, often to the on side.”Smith notes a number of counter-arguments, which he describes as “recurring memes”, in : “‘Yes, he’s the best player across the whole innings, but the gap between him and the next-best player is wider in the context of the end of the innings than at the beginning of the innings…’ ‘Yes, he’s a great batter, but we don’t want to use him high up in the order because we need him at the end to finish the match off…'”Related

  • How Jos Buttler made the scoop the cornerstone of his audacious batting

  • Jos Buttler: 'Managing risk is a big part of T20 batting'

  • Buttler and Hales lay down opening mark before Wood stars in high-scorer

  • Who's the best runner between wickets in men's T20 today?

  • Jos Buttler commits to Lancashire for three more years, despite rare appearances

But he is firm in his view that the best players should have access to as much of the innings as possible. “The case for superior players having access to maximum opportunity is rationally irresistible,” he writes. “It’s not much use having a brilliant batter finish off the match if it’s already too late for him to finish it as a win.”How does Smith square his view with the fact that AB de Villiers – whom he observed first-hand when consulting for Royal Challengers Bangalore in 2016 – prefers batting in the middle order? “Players touched by genius have their own way of looking at the game,” he says with a smile.”It may be that he’s so good that, in his head, he thinks ‘if I’m not out, we’re always going to win’. My own view is that I would want de Villiers to face as many balls as possible. If he went to No. 3, that’s fine, but I wouldn’t want him going much lower than that, personally.”His view shifts in the case of Andre Russell, who has opened in only two of his 367 T20 innings, and is best described as a hitter, rather than a batter. “I’m less sure there,” he concedes. “My feeling is that he’s uniquely well-suited to the latter stages. Buttler is a good example of the type of player who I’d be most reluctant to end up having seven or eight balls; Russell is slightly different, with his unbelievable power.”It is clear from that Smith does not believe England’s selectors have received enough praise for their decision to double-down on ultra-aggression by promoting Buttler – one which he indirectly compares to Houston Rockets leading the NBA’s three-point revolution and the success of Spain’s footballers when playing without a recognised striker in their side from 2008-12.”Once these strategies started to work, the debate simply shifted elsewhere, with sceptics becoming converts,” Smith writes. “This trend is another injustice awaiting anyone who is in the business of generating new ideas. When the ideas don’t succeed, they stick in everyone’s memories. But when the ideas do succeed, they become self-evident.”His argument is best illustrated by the shift in stance from the man who chaired selection for England’s T20 World Cup squad while recruiting for a new full-time selector, Rob Key. While working as a pundit for Sky Sports, Key was a strong advocate of Buttler returning to the middle order; as England’s managing director, he has accepted that he is best used as an opener.There is one thing missing from Buttler’s CV as a T20 opener: victory in a final. Perhaps, if he can fire England to the World Cup in Australia over the next four weeks, Smith will belatedly get the credit he justifiably feels he deserves. by Ed Smith is out now

Hanuma Vihari: 'I play to win, even if batting with one hand or one leg'

“Even if I motivated or inspired a few youngsters, then I would be happy. I feel it was worth it: worth the pain”

Nagraj Gollapudi03-Feb-20231:37

Vihari: I’ve never batted left-handed before

Pain, sweat, and at times, glory. Those are things that make the spectacle of sport a joy to watch. Hanuma Vihari had at least one tale to tell before this week through his heroics in the Sydney Test against Australia in 2020-21, when he – along with R Ashwin – battled through pain to take India to a nerve-tangling draw.This week the normally right-handed Vihari made headlines by batting as a left-hander in innings of Andhra’s Ranji Trophy quarter-final match against Madhya Pradesh in Indore after being hit on his left hand by fast bowler Avesh Khan. On Friday, Andhra bowed out of Ranji this season, but Vihari, their captain, spoke to ESPNcricinfo, after the game to talk about why he did what he did.How is your left forearm?
On the first day [of the match], we were batting first, [and] Avesh bowled a short-of-a-length delivery. I fended it off with my left arm, [but] when I got hit, immediately I knew that something was wrong because I had never felt that [kind of] pain before whenever I had got hit [in the past]. I wanted to continue, but I couldn’t. I couldn’t grip the bat.Related

  • Ajinkya Rahane's story fuels Hanuma Vihari's quest for India comeback

  • Vihari bats left-handed, holds off Avesh & Co despite fractured forearm

  • 'Knew it was the end of my series; whatever impact I'd have, it had to be then'

So I went off and went for an X-ray. It showed that I had a fracture [in the forearm]. I was devastated because maybe after 113 matches, I’m playing my first quarter-final in the Ranji Trophy. I had waited for so long to play that quarter-final, but that is what it is. The doctor assessed, and [advised] six weeks of rest. Thankfully, I don’t require surgery as of now. I got a plaster done.When did you decide you were going to bat again in the first innings?
When we were 262 for 2, our physio Deep Tomar called me to his room. He told me, “I wouldn’t advise you to bat because if you get hit again, you might need a surgery”. I said, “We are in a good position, so I don’t think I would need to bat”. But next day (day 2), we collapsed to 324 for 4, and then 350 for 7 or 8 [353 for 9]. Then I went and gripped my bat with my left hand, and I couldn’t do it.I looked at my other hand, and then I thought why not try to bat left-handed; just a thought came into my mind. Then I told the coach that I want to try to bat left-handed with one hand. The coach said, “Whatever you feel right, go ahead and do it”. My team-mates helped me actually put on the pads and every protection I needed: chest pad and arm guard. I tried to have a knock in the dressing room itself. I played a few balls [left-handed], then said, “Let me go ahead, and just try and add few runs for the team”.R Ashwin and Hanuma Vihari had battled through injuries to draw the Sydney Test in 2020-21•AFP via Getty ImagesHave you batted left-handed ever before at this level?
I’ve not even batted left-handed when we played tennis-ball cricket or in the street when I was young. I had never imagined that in a first-class game – that too in a quarter-final – I would be batting left-handed with a single hand.What compelled you to do it then?
I just wanted to go out in [on] the field and show that I don’t want to just be retired out and not be able to contribute. Even if I got out first ball, it wouldn’t matter, but I just wanted to be there on the ground, show our team that I’m there to fight for the team, [and] if I do that, then the rest ten of us will definitely give their best to win the game for the side. So that was the main intention.And it was an important game for Andhra: we qualified through a tough group, and we came into the quarters, so I wanted to lead by example, showing the right way forward for my team. Actually, we fought hard after that. Unfortunately, the result didn’t go our way.How light is your bat? It seemed like you were wielding a sweep.
Funnily enough, I didn’t take my bat because my bat is a bit heavier. I took the lightest bat possible in the dressing room.It was Avesh again who you would face first ball. You nicely timed it for a four past the square boundary. Can you talk about the sequence of events around that delivery?
Avesh was running in and bowling quick. He tried to bowl a yorker [first ball], which ended up being a low full toss. So I used the pace, and angled the bat. Luckily, it went to the boundary. But one thing in my mind was to just try and play the stump-line ball. And if he bowls a bouncer, then try to duck it, which is difficult batting left-handed. It was difficult batting right-handed itself, which I couldn’t do in the initial stages [after getting hit on day one]; but doing it with the left hand, [and] with a single hand [was more difficult].”We collapsed quite badly in the second innings. So I had to go in”, Hanuma Vihari on batting despite the injury•AFP/Getty ImagesBut one thing was in my mind that even if I get hit on my body, that doesn’t matter: I’ll play the stump-line ball, and try to play at least 10-15 balls, [and] as much as I could. The fear wasn’t there. Because I knew the basics of batting – whether it’s the right hand or the left hand – I know I can defend the stump-line ball. So I was quite sure about facing fast bowling, and I got out to a spinner later on with the ball turning, which I couldn’t handle with a single hand.In the first innings, at one point it seemed you were able to kind of lightly grip with your bottom hand (left hand)?
I was trying to, but when a bowler was running in, then I removed my left hand because I couldn’t exert any pressure on it. I thought there was no point.Was the opposition surprised watching you bat left-handed?
When I came in at No. 11 [in the first innings], they thought may be I would bat right-handed. But when I took the left-hander’s guard, most of them were surprised. “Is he really doing it?”, that was the kind of expression on their faces. But all the players and even the umpires were appreciative. At the same time they were quite competitive, and didn’t show any sympathy. I wouldn’t expect any sympathy [either], as we were playing a quarter-final.When you came back to bat the second time – as the last man in the second innings – what made you do that? Why did you risk going in?

We didn’t have enough [runs in the second innings] for a start. We collapsed quite badly in the second innings. So I had to go in to bat. I got the plaster [on the left arm] just after lunch. But after the drinks break post-lunch, we collapsed, losing three or four wickets quickly. So after tea, I knew I had to bat; I had to contribute some runs because we were in a tight situation. I thought going in was a right idea. I tried to put the glove in. I just managed to put the glove in, then I just went in and tried to play some shots.Did you need to take an injection as a painkiller?
I took some tablets, but not an injection. I couldn’t really sleep. It was hurting. I slept in patches, but when I have pain I had to get up; it was disturbing.

“The basics of batting helped: how to defend the ball, just watching the ball, and trying to meet the ball, which [though] was a challenge”Vihari on how he managed to bat left-handed despite naturally being a right-hander

You stepped out against spin few times in the second innings. Which was your favorite shot as a left-hander?
I was just trying to play the field (). I was just backing myself to connect a few balls. Actually, I missed quite a few, but luckily enough I connected three balls which went to the boundary. I made up my mind because the offspinner was bowling, and playing right handed is my strength. So I tried to switch [to sweep like a right hander], and play that shot, which went through the gap. The basics of batting helped: how to defend the ball, just watching the ball, and trying to meet the ball, which [though] was a challenge.You had summed up the experience of batting with a strapped right hamstring against Australia in Sydney in 2020-21 as “sweet pain”. How do you describe this one?
If we had ended up winning, I would have still said it was sweet. Although every one of us – the whole Andhra team – gave their best, we collapsed in a session, which is very hurting. But we are proud of the fact that we gave everything for the side. So I wouldn’t be disappointed. Even if I motivated or inspired a few youngsters, then I would be happy. I feel it was worth it: worth the pain.You are bound to be disappointed that Andhra did not make it to the semi-final. But Andhra were not going to make the quarter-final at one point, and you had to erase a tweet which read: “4 wins in 7, but not to be this year. We will come back stronger next year”. So at least you came forward a step?

I am definitely proud of the team for making it to the quarters, but I wouldn’t say I’m satisfied because we have a goal of winning the Ranji Trophy. So we don’t want to restrict or limit ourselves just to the quarter-finals. But next year, we have to make sure we are well prepared, and going all the way and winning the trophy.You have not been part of the Indian Test squad since the one-off Test in England last July. By your standards, you had a lean Ranji season without a century. But still playing this match through pain must give you the satisfaction that you play sport for the joy it brings?
I play sport to win – whether I score a century or whether I’m just contributing to the side. Obviously, any batter will want to get those hundreds and get those big runs in the season. But whether I play for India or whether I play for Andhra, I play to win, even if it’s just batting with one hand or batting with one leg.It is just about going out there, and playing to win and looking at how you have to contribute to the side. That is my main goal when I go into the field. I don’t really look at personal milestones or think about a comeback. I just go out there to win a game for the side.

'Let's play Bazball!' – Ranking England's 11 Tests under Brendon McCullum and Ben Stokes

From a setback at Lord’s to the craziness of Rawalpindi, we compare and contrast the Baz-approved method

Andrew Miller21-Feb-2023Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum came together as England’s new captain-coach partnership at the start of the last English summer, with the team in the doldrums having won one of their previous 17 Tests dating back to the previous spring. They’ve now been in harness for nine months and 11 matches, in which time they have won ten and lost one, and overseen a cultural revolution within the team’s ranks. But how have these XI performances matched up against each other, and to what degree have they epitomised the team’s ineffable mind-trick, colloquially known as “Bazball”? Here, ESPNcricinfo attempts to rank each of these performances in terms of their Bazziness* …Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum have overseen a revolution in England’s approach to Test cricket•Philip Brown/Getty Images11. South Africa, Lord’s – Lost by an innings and 12 runsThe first and only setback of the Stokes-McCullum regime, but can it really be described as a failure of Bazball, as such? South Africa’s seam attack piled into England with such ferocity, they were scarcely given the chance to deploy their new method in the first place – hence McCullum’s apparently counter-intuitive appeal to “go harder” at the end of a meek display. On an overcast first day, England were asked to bat first and set the tempo, a whole new proposition after four remarkable run-chases, and Kagiso Rabada was primed to seize on the merest hint of reticence. England’s response with the ball was gutsy but, with 165 on the board, they were always fighting a losing cause. However, the sight of Stokes getting physical in an 18-over stint was a sign of his determination to dig the deepest when the going got tough.Ollie Robinson returned to England’s ranks with a bang against South Africa•PA Images via Getty Images10. South Africa, Old Trafford – Won by an innings and 85 runsRelated

'I just can't see him stopping' – Stokes on Anderson becoming No. 1 again

Stokes 'blessed' by England's bowlers after floodlight strategy pays rich dividends

Root's mantra: To be 'consistently useful' within evolving England set-up

Mitchell disappointed after New Zealand miss out on 'couple of small moments'

'I'm not, as you'd say, Bazball' admits Foakes as Bairstow's return looms large

A rare example of England throttling back and coasting into a position of unassailability. South Africa blew their series lead through misguided team selection, ditching the dangerous Marco Jansen in favour of the second spinner, Simon Harmer – which in turn persuaded Dean Elgar to bat first to the visible delight of his opposite number. Despite being routed for 151, South Africa’s new-ball threat remained potent as England slipped to a wobbly 43 for 3. But Stokes throttled back in a relatively old-school stand with fellow centurion Ben Foakes, to grind out a position from which there could be no escape.Joe Root and Ben Foakes are ecstatic as their unbeaten 120-run stand took England to a five-wicket win at Lord’s•Getty Images9. New Zealand, Lord’s – Won by 5 wicketsA priceless victory in England’s first outing of the summer, and one that paved the way for everything that followed. Although a number of now-familiar tropes were on display throughout the contest – not least the sight of James Anderson bowling to six slips inside the first 30 minutes of the English summer – the new style was all a bit of a work in progress for a side which, at that stage, still hadn’t won a single Test in ten months. In the end, victory was sealed through a reversion to type. As had been the case throughout 2021, Joe Root stood head and shoulders over his peers, making 115 not out in a challenging chase of 279 – the first fourth-innings hundred of his career. Meanwhile, at the other end, Stokes rode some significant luck to produce a pointedly manic half-century. Though it wasn’t an obvious plan at the time, his refusal to play it safe was intended as a message to his troops.Stuart Broad went on a rampage under the Mount Maunganui floodlights•AFP/Getty Images8. New Zealand, Mount Maunganui – Won by 267 runsFor all its surface-level bombast, there remains a deeply strategic method to England’s madness, as showcased during the first day-night Test of the Bazball era. As had been the case on the Pakistan tour before Christmas, England’s batting tempo was a means to an end – but rather than driving towards a specific target for New Zealand to chase, Stokes’ main concern was session management, to ensure that his bowlers were granted the best of the conditions under the Mount Maunganui floodlights. The policy worked a treat. England romped along at more than five an over in each innings – ludicrously, they even had to apply the handbrake second-time around after threatening to burn out before nightfall – and twice their enterprise was rewarded by a clatter of twilight wickets. Three on day one, and five on day three, as Stuart Broad, fresh from his comic turn as the “Nighthawk”, embarked on one of rampages.England came from behind to beat South Africa in emphatic fashion at The Oval•Getty Images7. South Africa, The Oval – Won by nine wicketsFraught emotions swirled around The Oval following the death of Queen Elizabeth during the first-day washout. Day two was cancelled as a mark of respect, and when the match received special dispensation to continue as a three-day affair, England vowed to win it regardless in her honour … and duly wrapped up the series in a mere 909 balls, their shortest home Test in a century. South Africa were thoroughly discombobulated by the experience – they might have expected to be immune to the hosts’ national tumult, but a spine-tingling rendition of Nkosi Sikelel’ iAfrika scotched that notion. They shipped six wickets in the first hour, and were 118 all out by mid-afternoon, with a resurgent Ollie Robinson claiming 5 for 49. Most teams in England’s position might then have slowed down to speed up: bat once, bat big, and go for the innings win. England, on the other hand, opted to max out on mania. They screeched to 158 all out in barely a session – securing a lead of 40 from exactly the same number of deliveries as their opponents had faced, 218 – then laid into South Africa for a second time on a wild Sunday afternoon. Left with a target of 130, Zak Crawley and Alex Lees then went loco. But for bad light, they might have chased it down that night, instead they returned for five more overs the following morning.Rehan Ahmed is mobbed by his team-mates after dismissing Mohammad Rizwan•Getty Images6. Pakistan, Karachi – Won by eight wicketsThe fast-tracking of Rehan Ahmed, an 18-year-old legspinner with just three first-class appearances to his name, was quite possibly the most atypical selection in England’s Test history. But it also made perfect sense within the new team environment, for not only did Rehan meet the team’s needs on a spin-friendly surface, he arrived with full licence to rip his variations and settle into his work without worrying that a rank long-hop or two would see him banished to the outfield for evermore. On the contrary, that likelihood of looseness was priced into his threat, as Babar Azam discovered after holing out to midwicket to fall for 54 – for Stokes had kept a catcher in that position precisely to seize on any such lapse. A match-seizing five-for followed, whereupon Rehan was shoved up the order to No. 3 in England’s run-chase, with licence to treat his Test debut as an extension of the playground. Two preposterous slogged boundaries telegraphed the glee with which England were now playing their cricket.Mark Wood celebrates after England’s win•Matthew Lewis/Getty Images5. Pakistan, Multan – Won by 26 runsPerhaps this was what McCullum had meant about “going harder” when faced with adversity … in this case, Abrar Ahmed, Pakistan’s new mystery spinner, whose flicked front-of-the-hand release produced funky each-way turn and the sort of unknowable threat that had so often derailed less self-assured England line-ups. Sure enough, Abrar ripped out seven wickets on his very first day of Test cricket, but in the process he was taken at nearly a run a ball, as England lived up to their team mantra of “running towards the danger”. And yet, the brains behind England’s brawn was typified by the apparent rookie in their batting ranks. After chipping Abrar to mid-off on the first day for 9, Harry Brook processed his shot selection and vowed not to make the same mistake as he carried England’s second innings with a brilliant 108. “If he dropped one short I was hitting him over midwicket,” he said afterwards. “So it didn’t really matter if it was spinning.” With a taxing target of 355, Pakistan rose to the occasion in a spirited chase, but this time it was Mark Wood’s turn to “go harder”, with a gut-busting display of raw, raucous fast bowling to seal the series in thrilling style.Jamie Overton is congratulated by Jonny Bairstow after reaching fifty in his debut Test•AFP via Getty Images4. New Zealand, Headingley – Won by seven wicketsIf the Power of Positive Thinking could ever be named as Player of the Match, then this was the game in which it played clean out of its skin. By the end of it all, New Zealand were as baffled as they were beaten – particularly after watching a debutant fast bowler, Jamie Overton, rescue England from 55 for 6 in a stand of 241 with Jonny Bairstow that was somehow inevitable and unexpected at the same time. Either side of that opus, Jack Leach twirled his way to a maiden ten-wicket haul, thanks to a captain who had more faith in his bowler than the man himself – as epitomised by Stokes’ refusal to grant Leach a sweeper when the big shots started raining down, particularly from Daryl Mitchell and Tom Blundell, who made 308 runs between them across two innings. By tea on day four, they’d surely done enough to set up a consolation victory… not a bit of it. Chasing a lofty 296, England romped to 183 for 2 by the close, then wrapped things up in barely an hour on the final morning.Joe Root took on India with a brilliant century at Edgbaston•PA Photos/Getty Images3. India, Edgbaston – Won by seven wicketsA proper statement victory against a team that had bullied England into submission in the 2021 leg of their Covid-interrupted series, and the most emphatic evidence yet that Stokes’ men weren’t joking when they said that all that truly mattered to them was that number in the fourth innings. Pick your target, a daunting 378 on this occasion, and we’ll hunt it down – in a freewheeling 76.4 overs, as it happens, with Bairstow capping the season of his life with a second century in the match, and Root channelling his “inner rockstar” to riff his way to 142 not out from 173. The inevitability of the finish belied the battle that preceded it, not least in India’s first innings, when Rishabh Pant blitzed a breathless 146 from 111 balls, adding 222 in 39 overs with Ravindra Jadeja. And when Jasprit Bumrah reprised his match-turning counterattack at Lord’s in 2021 to carve a stunning 35 runs in a single Broad over, it seemed England had lost the plot. Hindsight, however, has backed up Stokes’ insistence that, for this England team, runs conceded are an irrelevance. By focussing on those ten wickets in every innings, the rest looks after itself.England celebrate the moment of victory as Jack Leach seals the Rawalpindi Test•AFP/Getty Images2. Pakistan, Rawalpindi – Won by 74 runsQuite possibly England’s greatest overseas Test victory, and by almost any measure the apogee of Bazball. On a dismally flat deck, in a country where they had won just two Tests out of 24 in 61 years, and even after a sickness bug had decimated the team’s build-up, England made every inch of the running. Stokes opted to bat for the first time in his tenure, and his players responded with mayhem. On the first day alone, they racked up 506 for 4 in 75 overs – the batting equivalent of Usain Bolt at the Beijing Olympics – which meant that, even after batting for the best part of two days in reply, Pakistan could neither wipe off their deficit, nor take enough time out of the game to make a draw inevitable. What happened next, however, was quite remarkable. Faced with little more than a session in which to post a target that was at once tempting yet defendable, England responded with a blistering turn of speed – 264 more runs at 7.36 an over, including Brook’s 87 from 65 balls, which was on course to smash England’s record for the fastest hundred, until he redoubled his intensity with the declaration looming. The eventual equation was 343 in the best part of 100 overs, and it proved as perfectly weighted as a 40-foot putt for glory on the 18th. With the winter sun dipping inexorably after tea, England ripped out the final five wickets in 90 minutes, sealing the contest in the 97th over with minutes of daylight remaining.Jonny Bairstow nails the pull off Trent Boult en route to a 77-ball century•Getty Images1. New Zealand, Trent Bridge – Won by five wicketsDo you remember the first time? Even after the eye-popping feats of the past nine months, there’s still been nothing to match the shock and awe of Bairstow’s post-tea onslaught on this free-entry final day, as England turned on the afterburners at Trent Bridge to finish the second Test in a riot of strokeplay. “Strip it back, it’s only you and the bowler there,” Bairstow said afterwards in a stream-of-consciousness articulation of the Bazball manifesto (as no one within the England dressing-room would dare to call it). “Ben at the other end said ‘don’t even think about hitting one down [the ground], hit it into the stands … it was do or die, so you’ve got to do.” England, remember, had conceded 553 in New Zealand’s first innings, with Mitchell and Blundell seemingly putting the game out of reach in a 236-run stand. But England muscled back to parity at a then-rapid lick of 4.2 an over, before duking it out in the third innings to give themselves a shot. Their target of 299 in 72 overs ought to have been outlandish. Instead, in a fitting tribute to the white-ball methods that the Test team had so dramatically co-opted, it was sealed in exactly 50.

*At the risk of aggravating England’s head coach, the phrase “Bazball” is used in this context as a convenient short-hand to describe the “new aggressive style of Test match cricket pioneered by England’s head coach Brendon McCullum and captain Ben Stokes in the summer of 2022, characterised by a focus on fast-paced, calculatedly risky batting, and a commitment to a wicket-taking approach with the ball, to heighten the entertainment factor of a Test match, and to encourage positive results where possible, thereby maintaining the appeal and relevance of traditional five-day cricket in an era now dominated by the T20 format.”

My life through the Ashes: from Deadly Derek to Warnie to Stokes' boys

A half-century of England-Australia contests only whets the appetite for more

Mark Nicholas12-Jun-2023It was a fine time to be alive – the Beatles and The Stones; George Best, Garry Sobers and Rod Laver. Nothing much else mattered frankly, except the Engand cricket team. Who could forget, however young they may have been, The Oval in 1968 when members of the crowd helped the ground staff mop the sodden outfield and open the door through which Derek Underwood marched to claim 4 for 6 in 27 balls and secure a drawn series with just six minutes of the five days remaining, it was Ray Illingworth’s team that toured Australia in 1970-71 who most fired our love of the Ashes. For those among us keen enough to smuggle transistor radios under their pillows at night and listen to the crackling sound of airwaves that told us stories of a vast and cinematic land where the sky was sapphire blue, the sun baking hot and the flies on the side of the locals, imaginations ran riot.We revelled in the commentators’ description of the Chappell brothers – Ian with his collar up, chewing gum as if that alone were a fight, and Greg, all upright elegance and gorgeous timing. We marvelled at the distant thought of a young Dennis Lillee – long hair flowing in the wind and bouncers flying – along with Rod Marsh, who, we were told, flew with gloves on to try and catch them. There was John Gleeson, the mystery spinner, whose bent-finger grip of the ball was learned from Jack Iverson; Bill Lawry, immortally named “the corpse with pads on” and Graeme “Garth” McKenzie, who had made a name with Leicestershire in county cricket and seemed too nice to bowl fast. A formidable bunch.But in Geoffrey Boycott we believed. Sure, he blocked the life out of many a day’s play, but there was something admirable about the bloody-mindedness in this bespectacled and apparently tortured Yorkshireman, who seemingly knew little of the world around him and everything about batting. The distance between him and the enigmatic and often moody writer of poetry, John Snow – who doubled up as England’s rather brilliant fast bowler – was vast but they were players in the same team, and even as winter closed in on West London, were the main subjects of imitation in the street outside the Nicholas home.Related

England have the fast bowlers to win in Australia. Do they have the captaincy?

James Anderson: Australia won't be able to cope with England at their best

Veteran ringmaster Stuart Broad still 'loving the Ashes circus'

Nathan Lyon: 'I've never conquered this game of cricket and never will'

Australia have fewer questions to answer than England in the Ashes

The commentators painted pictures so vivid, it felt as if we were actually watching it all, and in magnificent Technicolor too. When we drifted into sleep, the dreams of a future in this exciting world became the dreams of our lives.Illingworth’s lads won the extended seven-match series 2-0, with Boycott and Snow the key protagonists. Ted Dexter, working on the tour as a journalist, thought Boycott’s unbeaten hundred at the Sydney Cricket Ground the greatest innings he had seen by an Englishman and Snow’s 7 for 40 to clean up the match pretty much the best fast bowling. Later, he added Andrew Flintoff with the ball at Lord’s in 2009, and Ben Stokes with the bat at Headingley in the summer of 2019. We shall come to that thing of beauty in a while.The Ashes summers of 1972 and ’75 in England were stymied by controversy of the worst kind, and both dramas took place at Headingley. First up, the fusarium. Sounds ridiculous but Derek Underwood took ten wickets in the match on a pitch infected by a fungus that killed the grass. He wasn’t called “Deadly” for nothing, and on an iffy pitch of any sort, he could pick off pretty much anyone who walked to the wicket. “It was uncanny that it affected only a strip 22 yards by eight feet and the rest of the ground was perfectly healthy,” said Greg Chappell. EW Swanton left it at “The pitch was an embarrassment.”Thommo + Lillee on the rampage = a happy captain: Ian Chappell relaxes with a cold few in the dressing room in Sydney in 1975, Australia 3-0 up in the series•Alan Gilbert Purcell/Fairfax Media/Getty ImagesThree years later, things at Headingley got worse. To pull off a record chase of 445 and win the third Test, Australia required a further 225 on the final day with seven wickets in hand, but when the groundsman removed the covers soon after dawn, he found the pitch vandalised. Chunks of turf had been gouged from the surface and filled with oil. The first clues as to why came when the early spectators were greeted by the sight of perimeter walls painted with the slogan “George Davis is innocent.” Davis was a London cabbie sentenced to 20 years for armed robbery. Protestors had been campaigning for his release for a year and eventually got it. Two years later he was convicted of another robbery and sent down for 15 years. His brother was behind the movement and was to say “We can get the Ashes back anytime. But not my brother.” As it happened, it was raining by tea and the match wouldn’t have run the distance anyway. Once, it was oil for the angry and now orange powder and paint is used by Extinction Rebellion to protest against oil barons. How the great world spins.Meantime, down under in the winter of 1974-75, Jeffrey Robert Thomson had struck terror into the minds of the English batters and the hearts of those who watched from behind their sofas 10,000 miles away. In harness with Lillee, he was unstoppable, unleashing some of the most devastating pace and bounce ever seen, while snarling with a splendid sense of theatre. Richie Benaud said that Frank Tyson was the fastest bowler through the air he ever saw, and added that Thommo must be the fastest off the pitch. Did we feel for the England batters or did our ears prick up with excitement at the mention of these two extraordinary bowlers? The latter, I’d say, because their message of both aggression and rebellion perfectly suited the age in which popular culture and music had overtaken traditional boundaries and innate conservatism.By 1977 and the arrival of Ian Botham, World Series Cricket was on the table and cricket’s place in the order of things was to change forever. As Tony Greig said goodbye to his adopted land, Botham lurched through the gates to claim the throne as mighty allrounder and then England’s captain. Not that it lasted long. In 1981 after the second Test at Lord’s, he resigned the captaincy and returned to the ranks under Mike Brearley. The rest, as they say, is history. Botham played two great innings – one of them miraculous – and bowled with a previously unseen ferocity in that series. England came from behind and won. It was a glorious summer, made so by the wedding of Charles and Diana and this other, rather less decorated (at that time), hero of the people.And so the story ran and ran. Television and radio advanced, news expanded, data went deeper, social media allowed a global conversation, and politics continued to invade sport through its popular appeal – in short, anyone and everyone could have their say.Warne bowls Andrew Strauss at Edgbaston in 2005 with a close relative of the delivery that got him his 700th Test wicket, in Melbourne a year and a half later, off the same batter•Clive Mason/Getty ImagesThe Ashes featured household names on tap – Border and two Waughs; Gower and Gatting; more Botham, Merv Hughes, Mark Taylor, Mike Atherton, Darren Gough, and the incomparable Shane Warne, who lit up the stage he has now left so suddenly and too soon. Of all cricketers, Warne most held our attention. He was everywhere, front page and back; a glittering star in a game often reluctant to fully appreciate them. From 1989 to 2002-03 the Australians were exceptional and England not so. Warne rescued the narrative of the little urn almost single-handedly by giving something new, engaging and irresistible to the audience.”The art of leg-spin,” he says in his autobiography, “is the creation of something that isn’t really there.” He goes on: “It’s a magic trick, surrounded by mystery, aura and fear.” That’s it – fear. From the slow release of a cricket ball, Warne created fear. Or put a different way, Snow, Lillee and Thomson intimidated batters by hitting them on the head; Warne intimidated batters by eyeing them up and explaining the inevitability of him taking them down. He talked baloney much of the time, invented new descriptions of the same spinning ball and made it abundantly clear that he owned the ground on which they played. He has bowled the most Ashes balls and taken the most Ashes wickets. Don Bradman is his batting counterpart and both are well ahead of the rest.Warne was the outstanding player of the famed 2005 Ashes, when England regained the urn after 17 years. Had he not trod on his stumps one Edgbaston Sunday morning, he might well have cooked up a win from nowhere and galvanised his team to go on and take the series. As it is, England triumphed amid wild scenes of celebration that extended to an open-top bus parade through London, which ended, with the players much worse for wear, in front of tens of thousands of people at Trafalgar Square. It wasn’t that Admiral Nelson played any part but it was almost surreal that he was there, watching over such nationalism.The Australian team hated the excess in all that and turned their attention to revenge, which was exacted without mercy at home not much more than year later. England were crushed by the last hurrah of a truly great cricket team that had been led by Allan Border, then Taylor, Steve Waugh, and the best No. 3 batter to wear the green and gold since Bradman, Ricky Ponting. Warne and his compadre in the field of combat, Glenn McGrath, bowed out at the Sydney Cricket Ground, but not before Warne had claimed his 700th wicket with another dazzling ball to Andrew Strauss.Flintoff amps it up against Brett Lee at Lord’s in 2005; he took 24 wickets in that series. Four years on, he produced another epic performance at the same ground•Getty ImagesStrauss led his own team to victory at home in 2009, with Flintoff every bit as much the talisman he had been in 2005, when he had done a bit of a Botham on the country. At Lord’s, Freddie bowled so relentlessly fast and straight that Ian Chappell was moved to say he had not seen better; and remember, Chappelli hung out at first slip to Lillee and stood firm at the top of the order against Andy Roberts and Michael Holding.Strauss’ even more memorable victory came in Australia 18 months later, with extraordinary if very different batting from an eclectic group that included Alastair Cook and Kevin Pietersen setting up Jimmy Anderson and Graeme Swann to knock over Ponting’s suddenly vulnerable team. Since then, it has been comfortable wins at home for Australia and success at home for England.Until 2019, when it went to the wire.For Botham and Flintoff, read Stokes and the legend of Leeds. England were behind in the series, Headingley was do or die. Humbled for 67 in the first innings, Joe Root’s unlikely lads needed 359 to win in the fourth. The last day fell this way and that, a roller coaster in the true sense of sporting uncertainty. Stokes, having bowled two astonishing and long spells with a dicky knee and at great pace, dug in to douse the Australians’ flame before launching into an all-out assault that, in thrilling fashion, put out their fire. History will record the nearly factors – sixes inching over fielders’ heads; the Marcus Harris drop at third man (a difficult chance reminiscent of Simon Jones at Edgbston in 2005); the wasted, and last, Australian review, when moments later Leach was trapped in front of all three; the Leach run out that wasn’t; the Stokes lbw escape – but it will rejoice in the most magnificent innings, the best many of us reckoned we had ever seen.These are the matches and players I have known. I am no less excited now than I was then: well, perhaps a little, but only because the boyish enthusiasm has long gone. Of the players I didn’t see live, the contest between those great mates Keith Miller and Denis Compton would have been one to behold. So too between Benaud and Bradman; Hutton, Hammond and Hobbs; Trumper, Macartney and Grace. Perhaps Harold Larwood, most of all, during Bodyline, against the fine Australian batting of the day, or Bill O’Reilly: the legspinner who was the best bowler Bradman ever saw.Ben Stokes at Headingley in 2019, during the Test that now bears his name in folklore•Ryan Pierse/Getty ImagesO’Reilly raged against the machine, attacking officialdom with a rarely seen confidence and wit. His Catholicism saw him in scrapes, not least with Bradman, a Protestant, but his energy and concern for the Ashes never wavered. He called out for an even contest between bat and ball and a complete commitment from those lucky enough to represent their respective countries. He spared no one if criticism was due.One weekend in the early 1920s, O’Reilly received a call to go to Bowral – which he probably did by train and then bike, kit bag slung over his shoulder. He was later to call it a “dreadful mistake”. Early in the game and standing at square leg, he saw a diminutive figure approaching:”What struck me most about him was the difficulty he seemed to be having taking normal steps as he approached the wicket. His pads seemed to reach up to his navel. His bat was small and had reached the sere and yellow stage, where the yellow was turning to dark tobacco.”It was the boy Bradman, who made 234 not out.Later, Bradman made 5028 runs in 63 Ashes innings at an average of all but 90. Within these figures are 19 hundreds, 12 fifties and a highest score of 334.Who is next, one wonders. Maybe not another Bradman or Warne but for sure, players will emerge with the capacity for wonderful performances and to answer the call of the crowd. The greats of the game say that the Ashes defines you and it’s true – ask any of the 22 named at the toss on Friday morning. They will say the same. Bring it on.

'All hail Lord Rinku Singh' – Virender Sehwag and more pay tribute to KKR match-winner

Even though they needed 29 off the last over, the finisher took charge and got them through

ESPNcricinfo staff09-Apr-2023

Rinku!

— Brendon McCullum (@Bazmccullum) April 9, 2023

SUPER STAR RINKU SINGH @KKRiders

— Harbhajan Turbanator (@harbhajan_singh) April 9, 2023

How about that!!! @rinkusingh235 you beauty!!! That was just mental!! What a finish!! #korbolorbojeetbo #kkr #kkrvsgt #IPL2023

— Robin Aiyuda Uthappa (@robbieuthappa) April 9, 2023

RINKU

— Ben Stokes (@benstokes38) April 9, 2023

Singh a song of six pence!!!!#KKRvGT

— Brad Hogg (@Brad_Hogg) April 9, 2023

Rinku. Rinku. Rinku Singh!!!#IPL2023

— Mpumelelo Mbangwa (@mmbangwa) April 9, 2023

Rinku Singh

— Ashwin (@ashwinravi99) April 9, 2023

Rinku Singh

— Ian Raphael Bishop (@irbishi) April 9, 2023

Unbelievable hitting by @rinkusingh235 What a win by KKR.

— Irfan Pathan (@IrfanPathan) April 9, 2023

Unbelievable hitting from Rinku Singh. 6 6 6 6 6 4 6 from his last seven balls. #IPL has witnessed one of the most dramatic finishes ever. @KKRiders

— Yusuf Pathan (@iamyusufpathan) April 9, 2023

All hail Lord Rinku Singh. 5 sixes in 5 balls in the last over of a run chase. One of the best last over hitting in a chase that you would ever see. #KKRvGT

— Virender Sehwag (@virendersehwag) April 9, 2023

What an unbelievable game of cricket by @KKRiders
Needed 29 runs off the last over & enter @rinkusingh235

— @BrettLee_58 (@BrettLee_58) April 9, 2023

It seemed all over after Rashid's hat-trick but 6, 4, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6 in the last 7 balls he faced by Rinku Singh has seen @KKRiders pull off one of the greatest heists in IPL history!#KKRvGT #TATAIPL

— zaheer khan (@ImZaheer) April 9, 2023

Unbelievable performance by @rinkusingh235! 5 sixes in the final over to seal the victory. What an absolute beast! Congratulations #IPL2023 #GTvsKKR

— Suresh Raina (@ImRaina) April 9, 2023

Rinku Singh !!!
Naam toh Suna Hoga ?!#GTvKKR #TATAIPL2023

— Dhawal Kulkarni (@dhawal_kulkarni) April 9, 2023

I’ve never seen anything like it!!! #kingRinku #KKR

— Aaron Finch (@AaronFinch5) April 9, 2023

Today Rinku Singh changed the definition of final over thriller. Last ball six wala climax suna tha, last five ball sixes sapne mai bhi nahi socha tha. Rinku, what a finisher #Rinku

— Mohammad Kaif (@MohammadKaif) April 9, 2023

5 sixes to win in the final over! Have never seen something like this before. Take a bow @rinkusingh235 @KKRiders #GTvKKR

— S.Badrinath (@s_badrinath) April 9, 2023

Australia, meet Bazball

Judgement on tourists’ first meeting with new England needs a little more time

Andrew McGlashan16-Jun-2023It was a field Australia would not have been allowed in a T20 powerplay. In the third over Pat Cummins, the No. 3-ranked fast bowler in the world, armed with a new Dukes ball and an average of 21.74 had three fielders on the boundary for Ben Duckett.Leading into this Ashes, which has been dominated with whether England could do it against this attack and in turn how they would respond, Australia openly said that it was their field placements where a response to Bazball was most likely to be seen. They were true to their word. A few minutes earlier, Cummins had stood at the top of his mark to begin the series with a deep backward point in place. Australia had reacted to Bazball before a delivery had been bowled.Zak Crawley promptly got onto the front foot and crunched a drive through the covers. Mitchell Starc to Rory Burns this was not. By the time Cummins bowled his second over, there were three fielders back on the rope with just two slips and a gully catching. Whereas normally there would be a stacked slip cordon waiting behind the batters, now there were as many fielders on the boundary.When Nathan Lyon was introduced for the 10th over he started with four men out. Ollie Pope was 11 off 18 balls and there was long-on, deep midwicket, deep backward square and deep backward point. Within the first session of an Ashes series, England were essentially able to milk a bowling attack. The first 25 overs produced the lowest percentage of dot balls in a Test since 2002.”From a bowling front things went pretty well,” Josh Hazlewood, who had won the selection race with Mitchell Starc, said. “Obviously there’s things we’d change looking back and we’ll probably dig into that. It’s a different way of going about it, different fields at different stages. Some worked, some probably didn’t.”Related

  • 'So negative they were almost inert': How the media reacted to the Ashes opening day

  • Joe Root's Ashes reboot could be sign of new greatness to come

  • Declaration 'no surprise' on first evening of opening Ashes Test, Bairstow says

  • Jonny Bairstow: 'When your beans are going, you try to give it a whack'

  • Joe Root hundred guides England on freewheeling first day of the Ashes

Even though Bazball is now a year old, it is still often difficult to fully digest what England are doing with the bat, particularly when Joe Root reverse scoops Cummins and Scott Boland over deep third for six.Did Australia’s plan, formulated heavily by the work of coaches and analysts, to effectively go defensive work? England bounced along at 5.03 an over (marginally behind the 5.13 they scored at on the opening day in 2005). Australia did not bowl a maiden until the 37th over from Hazlewood and sent down just two for the day. But they claimed eight wickets having had to bowl first on what is a pretty docile surface.”Think you have to look at the end score, so eight for under 400, basically all out for 400. You’d take that on that wicket for sure, whether it takes 80 overs or 160. It’s the same score,” Hazlewood said. “We have to start to look at things a bit differently, not so much strike-rates and economy. It’s just about wickets and the score and if we can keep it as simple as that think it will go a long way towards wrapping our head around the new Ashes.”They could even have had a wicket caught a deep point. Boland bowled a short, wide delivery to Harry Brook who flayed it into the off side, but Travis Head was slow to react from the boundary and couldn’t hold on as he sprawled forward. The slowness of the pitch largely took out the short ball as a viable option for a sustained approach.Travis Head drops a catch from Harry Brook•Getty ImagesDespite the boundary-riders the scoreboard kept rattling along. It felt Australia had conceded ground very early, but they insisted they didn’t lose control. As a rather rough comparison, England hit 40 fours and five sixes today in 78 overs while in Mount Maunganui, where they declared on 325 for 9 after 58.2 overs, they hit 48 fours and one six.”There’s a lot more ones probably but if we shut down the boundaries then that score really doesn’t really go through the roof at sevens or eights,” Hazlewood said. “If we can keep it at five an over and keep taking wickets throughout the day that somewhat keeps them in check.”Last week, coach Andrew McDonald said the bowlers would have to accept a higher economy rate and it’s something they are buying into.”We talked between the final and this game, we caught up a few times with the coaches,” Hazlewood said. “You’ve got a red ball in your hand, got whites on, you think if I bowl top of off then it should be respected but think those days are long gone no matter who you are playing. India went at a fair clip last week as well. We are used to seeing that sort of stuff and it’s almost about taking the batter out of it and keep bashing away.”Australia made regular-enough inroads during the first half of the day to have their noses in front at two stages: when Boland produced an excellent delivery to clip Crawley’s glove with the last ball before lunch then when Brook and Ben Stokes fell in quick succession.With England 176 for 5, Australia were probably one quick breakthrough away from having a chance of keeping them to 250. There would have been very different reflections on the day. But Root and Jonny Bairstow, two Yorkshire mates, combined with an impish stand of 121 in 23 overs. Even when that was broken Australia couldn’t stem the scoring. However, the final twist (if it is such a thing these days) of Stokes calling his players in meant they were off the field before the close.In 2005 when England racked up 407 in 79 overs, there was a view that they had squandered the potential for a bigger total. History shows how that played out and there will be far fewer of those conversations this time given the now sustained approach to Test cricket. But in a similar way to how it took that match to play out to is conclusion to understand the context of the opening day, so too will a fuller judgement on Australia’s first meeting with Bazball need a little more time.

Focus on 'brainless' half-hour obscures England's bigger picture

England arrived at Lord’s as underdogs and left as favourites

Matt Roller29-Jun-2023England arrived at Lord’s as outsiders on Thursday morning, and left the ground 10 hours later as favourites. Not bad, for a team derided in several quarters as “brainless” and forced to defend their approach on a day where they gained a foothold in an Ashes series that had threatened to slip away from them.After 61 overs, England are 278 for 4 against a team whose spinner looks highly unlikely to bowl again in this match and are only 138 runs behind on first innings. Yet the focus has fallen squarely on a passage in which they lost three wickets for 34 runs, largely ignoring the 244 for 1 they added either side.Jonathan Agnew, the BBC’s cricket correspondent, interviewed Ben Duckett moments after stumps were drawn. “What about the general mood in the dressing room [about the fact] that three frontline batsmen get out in that fashion with such a clear plan, and with the spinner off the field injured?” he asked.Duckett was bemused. “I’m not sure how to answer that,” he said. “I’m surprised about the question. We’ve played positive cricket for the past 12 months and we’re certainly not going to change. We’re very happy with the position we’re in. If we can eke closer to them and even get a lead, I think we’re on top in this game.”The exchange laid bare the extent of the transformation in England’s attitude towards risk. Once, there was a right way to play, an unwritten moral code which dictated that the superior way to get out is while defending; now, there is no stigma involved in attacking, no tacit understanding that certain shots are off limits.Related

Lyon injury could yet define this Test

England loosen grip on Lord's Test in the face of short-ball barrage after Duckett 98

Lyon suffers 'significant' calf strain to leave Ashes future in doubt

England lost three wickets to the short ball in that period after tea, all of them playing attacking shots. Ollie Pope toe-ended Cameron Green to deep backward square leg; Duckett hooked Josh Hazlewood to deep fine leg; Joe Root plinked Mitchell Starc to square leg, where Steven Smith dived forward to take an excellent low catch.And it could have been worse. Root had earlier gloved behind to Alex Carey, only to be reprieved when replays confirmed Green had over-stepped, while Harry Brook – perhaps the most frenetic of England’s batters during a chaotic passage – was put down by Marnus Labuschagne at square leg, again taking on the short ball.This was, unquestionably, Australia’s moment. A frontline bowler down on a pitch that Smith described as “pretty flat and benign”, their change in plans – a short-ball barrage with fields set to match – brought them three quick wickets and brought them back into a game that had wriggled out of their control.But to hammer England for getting out playing attacking shots misses the point completely. Their mini-collapse did not exist in a vacuum, but in the context of a day where they had been so dominant that Australia – the recently-crowned World Test Champions, no less – were forced away from their own strengths: “We had to revert to different tactics,” Smith conceded.Ben Duckett cuts through point•PA Images via Getty ImagesEngland did not reach 188 for 1 by ducking, weaving, blocking and leaving, but by playing in the manner that comes naturally to a team filled with batters who have been brought up in the T20 era and who trust their attacking shots more than their defence. “I’m not happy I got out, but I’d rather get out like that,” Duckett said.Duckett rode his luck through his innings, with a handful of miscues that did not go to hand, but an element of risk is built into his game. Across his innings, he only left two balls, neither of which he felt he could have reached, and played 21 pull shots; the 21st got him out, but the first 20 brought him 23 runs.”10 metres either side of him there and I’ve got 100,” he reflected on his dismissal for 98. “I’d only have been disappointed if I’d have gone away from my natural game and it’s a shot that I play and it’s a shot that I’ve scored plenty of runs over my career doing so I’m not happy I got out, but I’d rather get out like that.”In another era, Pope would have walked back through the Long Room fearing a verbal barrage after being caught on the boundary on 42. Not now. “No-one in that dressing room will be disappointed with how he got out,” Duckett said. “Everyone will be a bit gutted that it didn’t go for six.”Popey said, ‘I’m going to get that side of it, and smack it into the stands.’ I said, ‘Go and do it.’ He was so unlucky to get a toe-ender there. If that’s anywhere near the middle, or even a top edge, it’s going miles back for six. It’s the way we play our cricket. If they’re going to have plans like that and we’re going to go into our shells and just get bombed out… that would be going totally against what we do.”Only when Ben Stokes walked out did England’s innings regain a semblance of calm – and even then, Brook did his best to further his commercial relationship with Major League Baseball by slugging another Green short ball for three through mid-off, either side of two more cross-batted swings for four through the leg side.Perhaps England could have batted differently for that half-hour. “Most of the bowlers probably didn’t want to keep charging in and bowling short stuff,” Smith said. “If you get under [duck] a few, it might stop but they kept taking it on.” Perhaps they could have been more ruthless, and reached the close two or three wickets down.But to fixate on three miscues risks missing the bigger picture. On Thursday, England scored at 4.55 runs an over against the best seam attack in the world, forcing their way into the ascendancy barely 24 hours after inserting Australia under heavy cloud cover and taking three wickets for 316.England have won 11 out of 14 Tests by embracing their strengths, dialling up the aggression and taking bowlers on – and they might well win this one, too. 18 months on from the limpest defeat in recent Ashes history, they can be forgiven for briefly leaning too far the other way on a day they dominated.

'Our next best have got work to do' – South Africa coach Walter after the whitewash

He was happy with the batters’ progress as the series went on, but said “it was an eye-opener for the bowling unit”

Firdose Moonda03-Sep-2023The South African season is only five days old but they have already seen how much work they need to do to match up to the top teams in the world.Yes, South Africa were testing some new combinations, but they were blanked 3-0 in the T20I series by an experimental Australian side. After the third match, their white-ball coach Rob Walter admitted “our next best have got work to do”.”The game is riddled with risk,” he said of the T20 format. “Sometimes it’s going to pay off and other times it isn’t. I was happy with the progress we made.”That statement applied specifically to the batting: after being bowled out for just 115 in the first T20I, South Africa made 164 for 8 and 190 for 8 in the second and third, respectively. But across the three matches, Reeza Hendricks was the only South Africa batter to make a half-century; Australia batters scored five, two of them by their new captain Mitchell Marsh. Still, Walter saw “some light at the end of the tunnel” in terms of how South Africa went about their innings in the third T20I, specifically in the way they recovered from 12 for 2.But, the only newcomer to contribute with the bat was Donovan Ferreira, who struck 48 off 21 balls on debut, while Matthew Breetzke (one innings) and Dewald Brevis (two innings) scored five runs each. Brevis’ much-anticipated arrival to the international stage, after he topped the run charts at last year’s Under-19 World Cup, did not go as expected. He holed out in the opening game looking to clear long-off and was caught behind for a first-ball duck in the second before being benched for the third.Walter, however, is looking forward to his future involvement with the senior side.”Dewald didn’t get many runs in his two opportunities but there is no doubting his quality and ability,” he said. “The positive was to give him an opportunity to test the waters in international cricket, so he has now got a good sense of playing a good team – what does that feel like.”Breetzke, who came out to bat in the first over on Sunday – after Temba Bavuma got a first-baller – and fell trying to take on the boundary fielder, also received praise from Walter for his approach.Donovan Ferreira made an impressive debut•Gallo Images/Getty Images”Matthew didn’t get many runs but it was great to give him an opportunity to make his debut,” he said. “Watching him go through his work and his training throughout this series, I am excited about what he has to offer. Even his dismissal – the courage to make a play in that situation is sometimes worth more than the actual result.”Ferreira’s knock was the standout as he “showed something special on debut”, as Walter put it. “To play like that and to hit the ball like that – it is exciting if we have these types of players in the ranks.”South Africa’s only bowling debutant was Gerald Coetzee. He has already been capped at Test and ODI level, but here he had a tough time. He picked up three wickets in as many outings but conceded 10.98 per over.By contrast, Australia’s new caps all impressed individually, starting with 21-year-old legspinner Tanveer Sangha. He took 4 for 31 on debut, barely more than 24 hours after arriving in South Africa, and was the joint second-highest wicket-taker in the series despite sitting out the second game. Matthew Short scored a match-winning 66 off 30 balls in the second match as Australia chased down a target of 165 with 31 balls to spare. Spencer Johnson took 2 for 33 in the first match and was the most economical bowler on either side in the third.The difference in the quality of contributions from the younger players was not lost on Australia’s batting coach Michael di Venuto. “Maybe our fringe players are slightly ahead of where the Proteas players are at the moment,” he said, but quickly cushioned his answer with a confidence booster for the hosts. “That’s not to say they can’t catch up quickly. I wouldn’t be panicking if I was in their dressing room.”Among the mitigating factors for South Africa appearing undercooked is that they have not played international cricket in almost five months since hosting West Indies at the end of last summer. It’s oft-repeated that what takes place in training cannot replicate the intensity in the middle, and this series was further proof of that. Though South Africa’s batting line-up was the most untested department, it was their bowling attack that struggled to consistently threaten Australia despite its experience.Lungi Ngidi, the leader of the attack in the absence of Kagiso Rabada and Anrich Nortje, went wicketless across the series. His variations proved ineffective as he ended up with an economy of 13.78. Lizaad Williams, Coetzee, Marco Jansen, Tabraiz Shamsi and Bjorn Fortuin all conceded more than ten an over; Aiden Markram (8.33) was the only one from the South African camp to go for less than ten. As a result, the bowling attack never looked like one that could win a series, and Walter did not shy away from that reality.”There’s no running away from it – their batting skill was better than what we had to offer with the ball,” he said. “We got a hard lesson in terms of not executing our skills. It was an eye-opener for the bowling unit.”South Africa are yet to appoint a bowling coach for their white-ball outfits after using former internationals Rory Kleinveldt and Quinton Friend in bit-part capacities but Walter confirmed that Eric Simons will accompany them through the ODI series and the World Cup. Simons is a former national coach and has years of experience with Chennai Super Kings in the IPL and their franchise subsidiaries across the world, and South Africa will lean heavily on his knowledge of subcontinent conditions as they prepare for the ODI World Cup.Their squad for the tournament will be named on Tuesday.

How often have players captained a side on their birthdays?

And is Virat Kohli the fastest to 20 ODI centuries?

Steven Lynch12-Sep-2023I noticed that Jos Buttler captained England on his birthday recently. How rare is this? asked Jennifer Roberts from England

Jos Buttler skippered England in a one-day international against New Zealand last week in Cardiff on September 8, his 33rd birthday. Things started well as he top-scored for England with 72, but he ended up on the losing side.Captaining on a birthday is reasonably common: this was the 31st such instance in men’s ODIs, and it was followed next day by the 32nd – Dasun Shanaka skippered Sri Lanka against Bangladesh during the Asia Cup in Colombo on his 32nd birthday. The only other Englishman to do it was Andrew Strauss, in what ended up as a sensational defeat by Ireland during the World Cup in Bangalore on March 2, 2011, his 34th birthday.Tamim Iqbal has made something of a habit of this, captaining Bangladesh in three ODIs on his birthday (March 20) in 2021, 2022 and 2023. Viv Richards and Arjuna Ranatunga both did it twice.There have been 15 instances in men’s T20Is, including another one by Shanaka (in 2022), and one by New Zealand’s Tom Latham (April 2), who also did in an ODI.There have been more cases in Tests, but only 21 occasions when a captain had his birthday on the first day of the match, when he presumably tossed up. The first instance of this actually featured both skippers: on March 11, 1953, in Georgetown, Jeff Stollmeyer (West Indies) turned 32, and Vijay Hazare (India) 38.Virat Kohli captained India in a Test against South Africa in Mohali that started on his 27th birthday (November 5) in 2015, and in a T20I against Scotland on his 33rd, in Dubai during the 2021 World Cup.I read that Tim David was the first to play a one-day international having previously played T20s for a different country. Is that correct? asked Mason Edwards from Australia

It’s not quite true. The hard-hitting Tim David played his first one-day international for Australia last week, against South Africa in Bloemfontein last week. He had previously played 28 T20Is, the first 14 of them for Singapore, where he was born in 1996. The particular distinction achieved by David is that he is the first man who made his official international debut for a country that doesn’t play ODIs to appear in one, obviously after being selected by a country that does play them. (In case it helps the explanation, Mark Chapman, who is now playing for New Zealand, previously appeared for Hong Kong – but they did have ODI status, and he played two such matches for them, as well as 19 T20Is, before New Zealand chose him.)By a remarkable coincidence, the first woman to achieve this unusual double completed it on the same day as David: on September 9, Mahika Gaur made her ODI debut for England, against Sri Lanka in Chester-le Street, after 19 T20Is for United Arab Emirates (and two in recent weeks for England). The UAE’s women’s team does not have ODI status.Which man has the best bowling figures in The Hundred? asked James Narracott from England

The best bowling figures in the men’s Hundred are 5 for 11, by the South African-born Manchester Originals legspinner Calvin Harrison against Northern Superchargers at Old Trafford last month. Harrison bettered the mark set in 2022 by another Originals player, Josh Little, who took 5 for 13 against Oval Invincibles, also at Old Trafford.There have been three other five-fors, by Marchant de Lange (5 for 20 for Trent Rockets), Imran Tahir and Henry Brookes (who both took 5 for 25 for Birmingham Phoenix). For the full list, click here. The only bowler to take five wickets in an innings in the women’s Hundred is Fi Morris – 5 for 7 for Manchester Originals against Birmingham Phoenix at Old Trafford in 2023.Hashim Amla is the fastest to 20 ODI hundreds, getting there in 25 fewer innings than the next fastest, Virat Kohli•AFPVirat Kohli scored his 20th ODI hundred in his 133rd innings. Has anyone got to 20 faster than Virat? asked Vikram Ramaswamy from India

The only man to reach 20 one-day international centuries quicker than Virat Kohli’s 133 innings is the South African Hashim Amla, who got there in 108. In third place is Australia’s David Warner who scored his 20th century in his 142nd ODI innings, against South Africa in Bloemfontein last week.Only 12 others have scored as many as 20 centuries in ODIs. AB de Villiers reached the mark in 175 innings, Rohit Sharma in 183, Ross Taylor 195, Sachin Tendulkar 197, Sourav Ganguly 214, Herschelle Gibbs 217, Chris Gayle 226, Saeed Anwar 243, Ricky Ponting 244, Tillakaratne Dilshan 279, Sanath Jayasuriya 350 and Kumar Sangakkara 366.Both captains during India’s Asia Cup match against Nepal were called Rohit. How rare is this? asked Husein Bharmal from Oman

The captains in that Asia Cup match in Pallekele last week were Rohit Sharma of India and Rohit Paudel of Nepal. The only previous instance of the captains sharing the same first name in ODIs was in Perth in 1990-91, when Australia were skippered by Allan Border and England by Allan Lamb.Border and Lamb also opposed each other in one Test, in Brisbane a few weeks earlier; other instances involved Herbie Taylor (South Africa) and Herbie Collins (Australia) in three Tests in 1921-22, and Jack Ryder (Australia) and Jack White (England) in one match in 1928-29. The only case in T20Is was by Mohammad Hafeez (Pakistan) and Mohammad Nabi (Afghanistan) in 2013-14.Molly Dive (Australia) and Molly Hide (England) opposed each other in four women’s Tests (three in 1948-49 and one in 1951), and Mary Duggan (England) and Mary Allitt (Australia) in three in 1963. Clare Connor (England) and Clare Shillington (Ireland) captained in an ODI in Pretoria during the 2005 World Cup. (I’ve tried to use the forenames by which the players were usually known, but nicknames or shortened versions of names might mean these lists are not quite complete, so, for example, Steve Waugh and Stephen Fleming did not show up in our query.)Shiva Jayaraman of ESPNcricinfo’s stats team helped with some of the above answers.Use our feedback form, or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

South Africa smash England's World Cup six-hitting record

The best batting team of the tournament posts another 350-plus total in the World Cup

Sampath Bandarupalli01-Nov-202382 Sixes hit by South Africa in seven matches in this tournament, the most by a team in a men’s ODI World Cup. They surpassed England’s 76 sixes in 11 matches in the 2019 World Cup.10.2 Sixes per ODI by South Africa in 2023, the best hit-rate for a team in a year (min: 100 sixes). They have hit 194 sixes in 19 ODIs this year, the second most in ODIs, behind the 209 by West Indies in 28 matches in 2019.8 Consecutive 300-plus totals by South Africa while batting first in ODIs. It is the longest streak in men’s ODIs, bettering the seven by Australia in 2007 and England in 2019.ESPNcricinfo Ltd4 South Africa’s 350-plus totals in this tournament, the most in a men’s ODI World Cup. They now have nine totals of 350-plus runs in all World Cups, which is the joint highest alongside Australia.4 Quinton de Kock’s hundreds in this tournament. He is only the third batter with four or more centuries in a ODI World Cup, after Kumar Sangakkara (four in 2015) and Rohit Sharma (five in 2019).545 Runs by de Kock in this World Cup, the first batter to score 500-plus in a men’s ODI World Cup for South Africa, surpassing Jacques Kallis’ 485 in 2007. His tally is also the highest for a wicketkeeper in an ODI World Cup, overtaking Sangakkara’s 541 in 2015.2 Double-century stands between de Kock and Rassie van der Dussen in this tournament. They are only the second pair with two partnerships of 200-plus runs in the men’s ODI World Cup, after Sri Lanka’s Tillakaratne Dilshan and Upul Tharanga.ESPNcricinfo Ltd8 Hundreds by South African batters in this World Cup – de Kock (4), van der Dussen (2), Aiden Markram (1) and Heinrich Klaasen (1). These are the joint-most hundreds for a team in a men’s ODI World Cup, level with Sri Lanka’s eight in 2015.357 for 4 South Africa’s total in Pune is their highest in men’s ODIs against New Zealand, surpassing the 324 for 4 in 2000 in Centurion.1999 The last instance of South Africa winning a World Cup game against New Zealand before their 190-run win in Pune on Wednesday. From 2003 to 2019, they lost all five matches against New Zealand at the World Cup.190 The margin of New Zealand’s defeat is their second-biggest at the World Cup. Their worst defeat is by 215 runs against Australia in 2007.ESPNcricinfo Ltd9 Number of ODIs won by South Africa in 2023 by 100 or more runs, the most such wins for any team in a calendar year, surpassing the eight by Pakistan in 1999. South Africa have won by 100-plus runs margin in each of their last eight ODIs where they batted first.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus