Forest eye move Ruben Vinagre

Nottingham Forest have already made 11 signings this summer ahead of their long-awaited return to the Premier League next month, and now a new potential transfer target has emerged.

What’s the latest?

According to reports coming out of Portugal (via Sport Witness), Nottingham Forest are interested in signing Ruben Vinagre this summer.

As per the report, the newly-promoted side are still in the market for a left-back and have now added the Sporting CP star to their list of potential targets.

Nottingham Forest are said in the report to be willing to offer a loan deal for Vinagre which would include covering his wages.

Cooper will love him

It was reported that Steve Cooper would like to sign another striker, left-back and midfielder amongst his many new faces at The City Ground to make sure that the side is ready to take on the challenge in the top-flight.

As a result, the signing of Vinagre makes perfect sense as he fits one of the profiles of the position that needs to be filled in the team and has had an impressive season in the left-back role at Sporting when he has been given the chance to appear.

Over 12 Liga Portugal appearances, the 23-year-old talent delivered one assist and created one big chance, making 1.1 tackles and completing 1.3 dribbles on average per game, as well as winning the majority of his duels (51%).

Despite the limited game-time in the side, Sporting CP did not lose a single game that Vinagre appeared in over last season which is a promising sign on the player’s positive effect on his team.

The ex-Wolverhampton Wanderers player was hailed “special” and a “talent” by his former manager Nuno Espirito Santo:

“He’s progressing, improving in a lot of things – tactically, technically.”

“But the talent is there and that’s why Vinagre is massively important to us. He’s so versatile and can give us some different things during the game. He’s special.”

With that being said, the signing of the left-back would be a major coup for Cooper in his pursuit to strengthen his Forest team ahead of next season and could put them in a great position to retain their top-flight status over the Premier League campaign.

AND in other news: “I’m told…”: Journo drops big Forest transfer claim that’ll leave supporters excited 

Everton: O’Keeffe drops on Gordon

The Athletic journalist Greg O’Keeffe has dropped a big Everton transfer update that’ll leave Frank Lampard scrambling.

What’s the word?

The news comes surrounding defender Anthony Gordon, with O’Keeffe tweeting: “Frank Lampard might draw the line at the prospect of an Anthony Gordon exit – but Spurs aren’t the only club circling.”

This news will come at a time when Tottenham are looking to sign both Gordon and Richarlison in a joint £85m deal, but Lampard wants to keep the 21-year-old winger as he plans for the future.

Lampard aims to keep Gordon

Following a campaign that saw Everton narrowly avoid relegation from the Premier League, there were very few players who performed well during what can only be described as a disappointing season and one that the Goodison faithful won’t want to go through again.

Gordon averaged a decent WhoScored rating of 6.70, ranking him in ninth place in the Toffees squad but it is his extraordinary potential that will have Lampard worried that a bigger team will manage to prise him away from Merseyside this summer.

With Richarlison looking increasingly likely to leave the club, Dominic Calvert-Lewin struggling with injury problems last season, and Salamon Rondon looking like a more terrible signing every passing day, Gordon represents the future of Everton’s attack.

The 44-year-old is convinced that the youngster can be important to the team going forward, saying: “I’ve been really impressed. From afar he looks a very talented young player who clearly has a strong connection with the fans.”

This praise should convince Gordon that his future lies at Everton and first-team opportunities will be much easier to come by compared to joining Spurs.

Gordon scored four goals and notched two assists over 35 Premier League fixtures last season, and his stats compared to Everton’s main goalscoring threat, Richarlison were surprising.

The Englishman generated more shot-creating actions than his more illustrious teammate (2.88 to 2.21) while also boasting a higher percentage of shots on target (43.2% to 28.6%) and delivering over double the number of crosses into the opposition box to Richarlison (71 to 29).

The supporters won’t want Gordon to leave and these stats prove that he has the potential to be a key part of what will surely be a new-look Everton from next season, while his sale would undoubtedly leave Lampard scrambling to find a ready-made replacement in the summer transfer window.

AND in other news: Imagine him & DCL: Moshiri can form deadly Everton duo in bid for “world-class” talent

Billy Gilmour could join Everton on loan

Everton securing the signing of Chelsea midfielder Billy Gilmour on loan would ‘suit all parties’, according to journalist Paul Brown.

The Lowdown: Tricky loan spell

The 20-year-old spent the 2021/22 campaign on loan in the Premier League with Norwich City.

Whilst the Scotland international made 24 top-flight appearances for the Norfolk club, he came under fire for a number of his performances.

Gilmour was singled out by some travelling Canaries fans for his display during Norwich’s 3-0 pummeling at the hands of Crystal Palace at Selhurst Park in late December, with manager Dean Smith later coming out and defending the youngster.

The Latest: Brown’s claim on Gilmour

90min have reported that another loan move for Gilmour is on the cards, with Fulham, Bournemouth, and Rangers all named as possible destinations for the 2022/23 season.

However, with Frank Lampard now in full flow with the Toffees, Brown believes that a move to Everton could be perfect for the young Scotsman.

Speaking with GiveMeSport, the Daily Star journalist claimed: “I think if Chelsea were to allow him on loan again, I suspect they would quite like him to go and play for Lampard because they know Lampard will look after him.

“And I think even if he doesn’t play every game, he would be an asset, so that seems like a move that would suit all parties to me.”

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/everton-news-5/” title=”Everton news!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

The Verdict: Good move for all

Former Rangers striker Kenny Miller hailed the 20-year-old during their time together at the Glasgow club, claiming that Gilmour is a “special talent”.

Whilst in charge at Chelsea, Lampard was also full of praise for the youngster. Dubbing him an “outstanding” player, the current Toffees manager handed the Scotland gem 17 senior appearances for the west London outfit, two of which came in the Champions League.

Therefore, despite an underwhelming spell at Norwich, a loan move to Everton could revitalise Gilmour’s career in the Premier League, particularly with a trusted, familiar face in Lampard to guide him along.

In other news: Frank McAvennie has reacted to this behind-the-scenes Everton development

Newcastle dealt Fabian Schar injury blow

Newcastle United are back in action on Sunday with another away clash in the Premier League.

This time, Eddie Howe’s side travel to the Etihad Stadium to take on Manchester City, who are trying to secure the league title and keep it out of the clutches of Liverpool.

Newcastle’s previous outing saw them take on Jurgen Klopp’s side at St James’ Park last weekend but they ended up losing 1-0 thanks to a goal from Reds midfielder Naby Keita.

Now that the Magpies are set to take on the reigning league champions away from home, it appears as though they have been dealt a crushing injury blow which could well have an impact on how Sunday’s match goes.

What’s the news?

Speaking in his latest press conference, Howe discussed the current injury situation regarding Fabian Schar.

The 44-year-old said: “We haven’t seen him this week. We hope he’ll be back to be available, but he’s not trained yet. He got a knock on the top of his foot, so he went for a scan after the Liverpool game because it was swollen up but fortunately there’s no fracture.”

While it’s positive to hear that there’s no fracture in the defender’s foot, it’s still a worrying prospect for Newcastle fans to possibly not have him available to take on Pep Guardiola’s side. Indeed, the fact that he hasn’t trained this week isn’t a good sign for his chances of being ready to take on City.

In terms of what he offers his team and what they will now be missing tomorrow, the 30-year-old has racked up 74 interceptions in the league this season at Newcastle, which is significantly higher than any other player in Howe’s squad.

Schar also has the second-highest number of clearances (120) to his name, as well as the third-highest number of blocks (38). This highlights just how much of a defensive unit he has been for his team and why he will be a big miss for them tomorrow.

Taking into account how City have already scored 84 goals in the league last season and will be desperate to win all of their remaining matches to secure the league title after their disappointing exit from the Champions League in midweek, Newcastle may well need all the defensive strength they can muster.

Howe and all Toon supporters will undoubtedly be hoping that their side can pick up a positive result this time out and that Schar can make a recovery soon.

In other news: PIF can blow NUFC fans away with “aggressive” £29k-p/w star, he’s better than Shelvey

Did South Africa underestimate the Umesh-Shami challenge?

Teams visiting India plan extensively for the challenge of facing spin. Our correspondent wonders whether SA failed to plan just as hard for the pacers

Karthik Krishnaswamy in Ranchi21-Oct-20196:34

Bangar: Umesh should be in the XI when India play at home

Straighten against the angle, beat the outside edge, hit the top of off stump. You’d usually be lucky to see three such deliveries in a series, but we saw three on Monday itself.Who did it best?

Watch cricket on ESPN+

India v South Africa is available in the US on Hotstar and ESPN+. Subscribe to ESPN+ and tune in to the Ranchi Test.

Was it Umesh Yadav to Faf du Plessis in the first innings, because the batsman seemed to be in a pretty good position to play the ball, and was still left clueless? Was it Ravindra Jadeja to Heinrich Klaasen, because of the trajectory and the length, which drew the batsman forward and still left him far, far away from the pitch of the ball? Or was it Mohammed Shami to Zubayr Hamza in the second innings, because, well, because of that Mohammed Shami seam position?If you relax the qualifying criteria a little, there was also Umesh to Quinton de Kock in the second innings, which went past the left-hander’s outside edge to hit off stump without deviating against the angle, and Shami to du Plessis, a jaffa like all the other balls, turning the batsman around and hitting his back pad.For India, it wasn’t just a 16-wicket day, rare as those are, but also one filled with memorable deliveries, especially from the fast bowlers. It’s been written about before that India’s quicks have outbowled South Africa’s through this series, and on Monday, Umesh and Shami perhaps hit their peak.There isn’t much that a batting team can do against this kind of bowling. You can nitpick at the footwork – or lack of it – that contributed to some of these dismissals, but do remember how well the fast bowlers used the bouncers to push the batsmen back.ALSO READ: Umesh and Shami revel in toss advantageExcept, well, isn’t this a challenge top-order batsmen know very well, and one they deal with through their careers? South Africa’s batsmen, in particular, have grown up facing fast, hostile bowling all their lives. And yet.Most teams come to India prepared to face a lot of spin. South Africa are no exception to this, and in their very first innings of the tour, in Visakhapatnam, they showed how alive they were to that challenge by playing proactive cricket and using calculated risks to try and put the spinners off their lengths.Hamza, playing his first Test of the series, looked at ease against spin in the first innings, his footwork light and decisive, and his strokeplay emphatic, until he was dismissed attempting to cut Jadeja off his stumps. It was clear that he too had prepared extensively to deal with India’s spinners.But as comfortable as some of South Africa’s batsmen – and even their lower order – have looked against the spinners, they’ve all been undone time and again by pace.Umesh Yadav celebrates the wicket of Heinrich Klaasen•Associated PressIt shows in the numbers. R Ashwin’s average for this series (25.26) isn’t too far off his career average, while Ravindra Jadeja’s (30.69) is well below his, especially in India. Umesh (12.18) and Shami (14.76), however, have achieved absurdly good numbers.Which begs the question: did South Africa plan just as hard for the challenge of facing India’s fast bowlers as they did for the spinners?”I would say, based on just the general thought of playing in India, you’d assume that it would be tougher to play against the spinners,” Hamza said during his press conference at the end of day three. “In saying that, we knew, obviously first we’d have to get through the quick bowlers that they’ve got, who are extremely disciplined and professional about the way they go about doing their job, so I wouldn’t say we underprepared against the seamers. I would just say that maybe we should have prepared more mentally in terms of playing them in whatever conditions that we were faced with.”The foremost mental challenge that India’s quicks posed was how relentlessly they made the batsmen play. Typically, in South Africa, opening batsmen would go out looking to leave as many balls as possible, but here, Shami and Umesh hardly allowed them to do that. A couple of Dean Elgar’s dismissals in this series, in Pune and in the first innings here, when he was caught in the grey zone between playing and leaving, showed how hard it can be to make that adjustment.”I would say that with the new ball they just forced us to play at more balls,” Hamza said. “They bowled attacking lines, they didn’t allow us to leave the ball many times, and by asking us to play at the majority of balls, given the fact that they’ve got good skill as well, obviously we’re going to have to be on top of our game in defence to keep those good balls out, and we haven’t done that.”The pitches for this series haven’t offered a great deal of help to the spinners. There have been phases – the fourth innings in Visakhapatnam, and the second innings here – where inconsistent bounce has made batting difficult against the quicks, but otherwise, there hasn’t been any exaggerated assistance for them either.Shami and Umesh have bowled brilliantly to make the most of whatever help they’ve had, but there is a lingering sense that South Africa could have done more to combat their modes of attack. Perhaps their failure will alert future touring teams to prepare better against India’s fast bowlers.

The man who breathed cricket

If you ever wonder what Pakistan might do without Misbah, the reverse is a more frightening prospect: what will Misbah do without the game?

Osman Samiuddin14-May-2017It seems so long ago now, but it was only New Year’s Day, a Sunday – Morrissey’s Sunday, silent and grey. The weekend was at an end and a dream had curled up and away like smoke, so that it was impossible to know whether it had even been there in the first place. Actually it had ended on Friday, the last day at the MCG, when Pakistan ran into the impenetrable walls of history. Friday had been too much for Misbah-ul-Haq. By its end he was questioning his own mind, and it left him on the verge of leaving the very thing that keeps him alive, that which he breathes every passing second, that which he cannot help but think or talk about for as long as is a piece of string.On Sunday he and his team – family he calls them – were at Waqar Younis’ Sydney home for dinner. New Year’s Eve, with the team in his hotel room, had lightened his mood a touch. Now at the dinner he looked to be… slightly less inclined to retire, I want to say, but how do you ever know how Misbah is feeling just by looking at him?This being a social occasion, it seemed impolite to ask him outright whether he was going to retire (whispers already were that he wouldn’t). So a more roundabout approach: are you satisfied with what you have achieved?The really short answer, which, being Misbah, he didn’t give, was yes, just about. He recognised he had overseen a special time, something with enough force of its own to wake him up in these forthcoming mornings, when he will have fewer reasons to wake up than he has had for years. The long answer? Let’s just say there are umpires out there for whom the cold stare of Misbah was never as benign and dead of feeling as it was for the rest of us. The most winning Test captain in Pakistan history cannot forget decisions that have incorrectly gone against his side, and cost, by his reckoning, five or six more wins. He remembers each umpire and, with a fair degree of accuracy, the scores of the batsmen and team at the time. It’s not malice, just deep frustration.He sidestepped into an obligatory fret about domestic cricket, as a function of his helplessness: the national side has had success, but as far as deeper change goes, he knows this was phlegm trying to put out a fire. He had no idea how painfully well that point would be illustrated a month later with the PSL spot-fixing scandal: cleaning up after the mess of one when he came in, leaving amid the mess of another.Still, don’t file it away alongside the standard gripes of other former players – Misbah knows the domestic game at a level of intimacy and familiarity that escapes most. It is a by-product of his complete devotion to the game. As recently as last month he was leading Faisalabad to the Grade II Quaid-e-Azam trophy. We are in a time in Pakistan where jokers on the fringes of national selection find ways to avoid playing domestically and Misbah happily leads a side at a level first-class. On becoming Pakistan captain, not only did Misbah not abandon domestic cricket, he seemed to immerse himself deeper into it. He made sure he played as many domestic first-class games as he could: 14 doesn’t sound a whole lot, but to name but two prominent, long-serving captains, Inzamam-ul-Haq played six and Wasim Akram two.

Given how Pakistan had lost in Melbourne, cricket might reasonably have been the last thing he’d want to talk about. Yet cricket was his salve to the wound cricket had inflicted in the first place

And he gave it value by relying on players who had toiled in it as long and hard as he had, not ones who had been fast-tracked parallel to it. Subsequently their successes were proof that the system Misbah had come from wasn’t in as much disrepair as it was thought to be. As for how it is functioning now – you know what, Misbah has plenty of time on his hands now, and he’ll happily take appointments and talk you through it.He reminisced the rest of evening away, as you might do about the homeland when you’ve been away too long or can never go back. He did it happily, glumly, indifferently, but he did it unfailingly. Those days when he used to bowl “finger” in tape-ball cricket or legspin on cement tracks; or, when he chose to bowl medium pace, how much he could swing it. One day he got the yips, couldn’t work out why and gave it up. Once, he bowled offspin to Imran Farhat in the nets. In Misbah’s telling, he bowled him twice and drew an edge twice more. Another time, Taufeeq Umar was short on confidence facing Graeme Swann, so Misbah and Mohammad Hafeez bowled to him in the nets. In a short while, Umar packed up and left, lower on confidence. Misbah looked warmly at an old match ball on display in Waqar’s dining room and then had the room in fits talking about the many you-know-whats on it.It’s not unusual that he only talked shop. But given how Pakistan had lost in Melbourne, and the impact it had on him in the immediate aftermath – and we were only two days out of it – cricket might reasonably have been the last thing he’d want to talk about. Yet cricket was his salve to the wound cricket had inflicted in the first place. Without complaint or frustration, he even defended those plans for Yasir Shah. Too soon Misbah, too soon.Except not for him, because what else is there? If you ever wonder what Pakistan cricket might do without Misbah, console yourself with the thought that the reverse is a more frightening prospect: what will Misbah do without cricket? He’ll find a role, of course. Commentator, coach, director, something will come up. But what will he do off the field, without a helmet on and an attack to defy, or under the white floppy, with spinners to deploy, not bringing all his ice to the inferno of professional sport?

****

They didn’t exactly sell the captaincy to Misbah. It was offered to him in October 2010 in a small clerk’s room in Gaddafi stadium. The board wanted to keep it so secret, they couldn’t even arrange the meeting in the chairman’s room. Misbah was told there were no other options, which tells us Ijaz Butt’s negotiation skills were not so sharp. Misbah kept it secret from everyone, even his family, for a week. It was as if everyone was embarrassed about what was happening.He doesn’t remember the team talk he gave on his first morning as Pakistan captain. He thinks he probably left it to Waqar, once his captain, then his coach. Imagine that dressing room, like a hastily arranged get-together at fresher’s week: only two of the XI who played in that Test had played with Misbah in his last Test then, in January that year; only four of the XI had played in Pakistan’s last Test, one in August.Kardaresque: Misbah built his side from scratch and it was as much a nationalist project as a sporting one•PA PhotosWhat he does remember is his unbeaten, final-day 76, which, along with Younis Khan’s hundred, saved Pakistan. In the memory that Test passes mistakenly for a bore draw, and from a distance of over six years, it is easy to forget why he puts such great stock in the innings. The draw wasn’t actually a foregone conclusion, not until the last hour, and there was something in that Dubai surface that day, some rough for the spinners, some reverse for an old ball. There was plenty of heat from an opposition expert at cranking up those pressures a new captain might be under. Misbah survived, in a style that would quickly become familiar – poker-faced, a whole heap of forward defensives, a close call or three, in constant motion against spin, in steady repose to pace.Just imagine, though, that he had failed, and/or Pakistan had lost. Pakistan had been through four captains already in a year – what price a fifth? So what he did with that innings was to put in place the first, most crucial pillar of his captaincy: runs. To those who scoffed at the appointment? Runs. For those who didn’t know who he was? Runs. To those who thought him ill-equipped to lead? Runs. For a side in trouble? Runs. For a side in control? Runs. Win, lose, draw, bore, thrill, dawn, dusk – runs, runs, runs. Seven fifties and a hundred in his first 11 innings as captain and just six months in, Misbah had set like cement. The runs never really stopped. Over 4000 as captain, an average over 50, and a clincher: until last winter’s slump down under, the longest stretch he went without a fifty was four innings. He was never out of runs long enough to be challenged.For a long while, this was the metaphor: Misbah saving Pakistan with the bat, Misbah saving Pakistan in toto. It was neat if dramatic and lazy, and it did him a disservice. Because once you peeled away the runs and all the stuff about his dignity and MBA, or his calm and stabilising influence, underneath it all was the man’s fascination – nay, obsession – with the actual game. Every little challenge it threw at him on the field – trying to remove a set batsman, getting a field just right, tweaking an angle of attack, dousing the fire of an opposition bowler; these, rather than some grander diplomatic mission to right Pakistan’s name, drove him.After years and years – maybe, in fact, a lifetime – of discourse on Pakistani captains centred around personality traits, or imprecise diktats on how to play, here was sweet relief. Misbah could, and often did, break down in great detail his on-field moves, or the technique of a player, or just a particular passage of play. Just recently, in fact, in praising Younis’ 177 in Pallekele, he pointed out the slight technical adjustment Younis had made – something even Younis has not spoken about. One day he may choose to make public his irritation with a coach who regularly encouraged the team to go and play positive: sure, Misbah would think, we all know to do that, but isn’t it your job to lay out how, practically, we do that? If there was an “i” left undotted or a “t” uncrossed, you weren’t in Misbah’s world.Pragmatism was a hallmark, not only specifically in the kind of batsmen he preferred but also in going all in with spin when pace resources were thin. Patience, too; in instilling the virtue into his side but also in working away at the lack of it in opponents. The Misbah choke was an acquired taste, lost on the more impatient, or to those obsessed with fancy, showy captaincy. But its subversiveness was grand – he was using the modern game against itself.Dismiss all this as geek love, but put Misbah’s sides up against any Pakistan side from history and nobody, not even the most casual follower, could fail to recognise it. Some appreciated how it was, some didn’t, but this much is inarguable: that only the most influential captains can hope to imprint themselves so indelibly on a group of men that they are, unmistakably, his men.

****

The late twist though, because, this being Misbah, we cannot end without it. It has been the detail to so many of his innings, as well as the broad stroke of his career. Now his captaincy too: seven defeats in Pakistan’s last eight Tests – including home and away to a West Indies side that would struggle to compete with their predecessors this century, let alone those of last century – is a twist as much as a twist is strictly interpreted as a downward spiral.

This much is inarguable: that only the most influential captains can hope to imprint themselves so indelibly on a group of men that they are, unmistakably, his men

Mark some of it as the inevitable comedown post England and the No. 1 ranking. That kind of high knows only a down. The rest has been life reminding us that it is real and not fairy tale, and that it creeps up on us before, one day of its choosing, boom, it is all over you. And then, the core inside men that makes them what they are starts to flicker and fade. Convictions shrink into doubts. Strengths betray you and turn up as weaknesses. Judgements become clouded. Decisions gain an unbearable weight, because their consequences mean more. The end, you can see, is a question mark, not a full stop. And if it brings relief, accompanying it is fear and uncertainty.Life happened to Misbah in Australia, in the most crushing way imaginable, because it was the one that had come to mean the most. He made a series of bad calls with the bat. In the field he was a guitar out of tune, not by much, but enough. His sense of caution, usually well calibrated, now ate him whole, most visibly in his use of Yasir. How could he – of all people – have used spin so poorly?No doubt it soured the taste a little. It was the gentle smudging of the ink at the bottom of a letter otherwise impeccably handwritten. He knows it too. And the question now is the question that has always been, first formed that day at the Wanderers. Are we to define Misbah by the scoop into Sreesanth’s hands, or by the innings that preceded it, that breathed the life in the first place so that it could be eventually sucked out?Me? Time will wash away the last six months. An Australian whitewash is part of the Pakistan constitution; New Zealand barely mattered, it happened so quickly; West Indies? Shit happens.And then it will become clear that what he accomplished was a task similar in nature to the one that confronted AH Kardar, of building a side from scratch orchestrating a nationalist project; that he then acquired the gravitas of Imran Khan, through results, individual performances, and from his effect on his side; that he even brought the sharpened game sense of Mushtaq Mohammad and Javed Miandad, but thankfully none of the annoying Karachi traits; and that he did it with a giant handicap none of them faced.Forget that question. The answer is, he stands tall and proud, unbowed, undaunted and undimmed in any company of leaders we could wish to put him in.

Breaking the bat, Mustafizur style

Plays of the day from the second T20I between Bangladesh and Zimbabwe in Mirpur

Mohammad Isam in Mirpur15-Nov-2015The bat-breaking cutterRegis Chakabva tried to fend back a Mustafizur Rahman cutter that nearly lobbed back to the left-arm bowler, but it fell inches short. Though Chakabva was safe, his bat was gone. The ball struck the splice of the bat, bending it backwards and it required Chakabva to change his bat.The grabSean Williams dived to his left full length to take a superb catch in the fifth over of the Bangladesh innings. The on-field umpires took a second look at the catch, but it was always going to be a clean grab. Imrul Kayes, the batsman, was disappointed to see his square drive thwarted in such spectacular fashion. The catch slowed down Bangladesh’s approach after Kayes and Tamim Iqbal had made a fast start.The false reverseAnamul Haque had cleanly struck a reverse sweep in the eighth over, the ball flying over short third-man for his first boundary. Devoid of big hits and battling a slow run-rate, Anamul’s second attempt at the shot in the 14th over also yielded a four, but it was given as byes as both Anamul and wicketkeeper Regis Chakabva missed the ball. It was one of two boundaries during a fourth-wicket stand that lasted 6.1 overs.The dangerous footworkSikandar Raza leaned into Mashrafe Mortaza’s first delivery of the Zimbabwe innings, but expected the ball to be fielded by Mahmudullah at mid-off. Mahmudullah tried to stop the ball with a sliding left foot that could have twisted dangerously. He missed the ball and it went to the boundary, but the damage could have been far worse for Bangladesh.The unstoppable policemanAfter Mustafizur Rahman overstepped and handed Neville Madviza a reprieve in the 19th over, the players got back to their mark. Suddenly two policemen started to run past the sight-screen as the bowler waited for Madviza to take strike. Another policeman was about to run away when a groundstaff held him by the arm, refusing to let go. They argued for a second before the policeman freed himself and walked across the sightscreen. By then, Mustafizur was already in his run-up, and Madziva missed the free-hit. The batsman didn’t complain though.

Maturing Stokes fires England hopes

Ben Stokes has learned plenty from a bumpy year with England and believes the team can still confound low expectations at the World Cup

Alan Gardner04-Nov-2014″I’m not a psycho.” The very fact Ben Stokes has to utter these words, from behind a wide grin, tells you something about his character and the combustible reputation he has developed in the last 12 months. Stokes’ spunky streak endeared him to England fans in his debut Test series, the misery-freighted Ashes whitewash; shortly after, in the Caribbean ahead of the World T20, it caused him to break a wrist punching a locker.That, he admits, was taking being combative too far, though it was frustration at failure that got the better of him. As England began afresh in the summer under Peter Moores, Stokes had to fight again, this time for his place in the side.He remains an uncertain starter for England in ODI cricket but, with the squad having assembled in Loughborough for a three-day training camp ahead of their seven-match tour of Sri Lanka and the World Cup rapidly approaching, his old-fashioned moxie may be just what a team lacking in self-confidence needs.Being nicknamed “Psycho” is not necessarily an impediment in the sporting arena – as former Nottingham Forest and England left-back Stuart Pearce would acknowledge – but Stokes is nevertheless keen to stress his increased maturity. Aged 23, he is already a father and his partner, Clare, is expecting their second child. The due date is a week after England begin their World Cup campaign and Stokes seems as relaxed about that as he now is around metal storage units after getting out cheaply.Stokes’ passion and ability have already endeared him to England fans, who well know how a charismatic allrounder can ignite the team’s fire, but his utility is likely to depend on “channelling emotions in the right way on the pitch”, as he puts it.”I think now, as I have played a lot more cricket, you can’t let emotion get on top of you because it can actually take away how you deliver on the pitch,” he said. “As a kid, I lost my temper quite easily and tended to look away from the actual game itself. Now I know how to manage that and make sure I’m getting the best out myself.”Stokes not planning baby birth dash

While many cricketers in the modern day interrupt touring to return home for the birth of a child, Ben Stokes is ready to take the old-fangled route and put work first.
Stokes’ second child is expected on February 21 – a day after England’s World Cup match against New Zealand and two days before they play Scotland – but he is not currently contemplating a round-the-world dash.
“We have spoken about it but we don’t know what’s going to happen. I don’t want to miss any cricket and she’s totally on board with that,” he said. “If I can get back and it doesn’t affect any cricket, then, yes.
“It sounds pretty heartless to say I’m laidback about the birth of my child but I’m lucky that Clare completely understands my job and the situation. She actually said ‘If we tell your daughter the reason you weren’t at the birth is you were playing for your country, I reckon she will think that’s quite cool’.”

Anger management is a term that has cropped up recently, in the wake of cases involving James Anderson and Andrew Gale, but Stokes said the locker incident had not led to any special sessions with the England psychologist, Mark Bawden. “It wasn’t like I had lost my mind,” he said, before conceding: “Obviously it got brought up. I just said I can’t be doing that. I’m not a psycho.”Perhaps a more fitting description is “competitor”, and Stokes is still likely to flash a malevolent glare at opponents in the heat of battle, but it seems fatherhood has helped provide a useful equilibrium.”The one thing from having a child is they are exactly the same no matter what sort of day you’ve had, whether it’s been good or bad. They bring you completely down to earth and take you away from all the emotions you can have from playing a sport. You tend to forget about everything that has happened when you walk through the door, so I guess it has changed me.”As the joke about how many psychiatrists it takes to change a lightbulb goes, the key is wanting to change. Stokes is now a senior player with Durham and his Man-of-the-Match performance in the Royal London Cup final, when he took responsibility for his team’s run chase, showed the sort of temperament international cricket demands. England, too, want to change perceptions about their approach to the 50-over game and Stokes believes it is in their hands to do so.”Over the last couple of years one-day cricket hasn’t been our strongest format but we want to be one of the best teams in the world at it,” he said.When Stokes made his international debut, as part of Alastair Cook’s ODI side in 2011, England were on an upward curve that would see them briefly ranked No. 1 in the world. Since then, they have only won two bilateral series (excluding one-off matches) out of nine and are considered firmly in outer orbit as far as World Cup chances go.Whether they succeed or fail in Sri Lanka, where conditions will differ markedly from Australia and New Zealand, is unlikely to dramatically alter perceptions but, for England as well as Stokes, the trip will be about fostering belief and settling on plans. Stokes played three of the five ODIs against India at the end of the summer and is beginning to adapt to his role as fourth seamer, batting at No. 7.”I’ve been up and down the order quite a few times now so for me at the moment it is just about getting a solid position,” he said. “I know my role more with the ball but I had a chat with Mooresy towards the end of the one-day series about batting seven and that did do me some good. You can lose early wickets and have to build an innings, which I’m more used to, but then you can also be in the situation I was in at Headingley where you go in at the end and try and get as many runs as possible. So it’s just about being versatile.”Stokes thinks he is a better player than he was in Australia last winter and he will hope to show it at the World Cup, which will also provide an opportunity to play in the country of his birth. Stokes’ parents are from Christchurch, where England take on New Zealand – the day before another member of the family is expected to arrive – and it is perhaps because he has so much to look forward to that Stokes has little time for those writing off Cook’s team.”Hopefully the people who have said that will be eating their words. We’re 100% confident of what we have got coming ahead and we’re definitely giving ourselves the best chance to be hopefully lifting the trophy.”

Exhilarating, but one-dimensional

From Akash Kaware, Canada

Cricinfo25-Feb-2013
Revolver EntertainmentIn 1995, West Indies lost their tag of undisputed champions of Test cricket to Australia in a seismic series and started the slide down a slippery slope of defeat and despair that continues to this day. For someone like me who started following cricket only in 1996, the current bunch of strugglers in maroon is a much more familiar sight than the juggernaut that steamrolled anything and everything that came in its way for a mind-boggling period of 15 years.For young cricket fans and old, , the much-acclaimed documentary on Clive Lloyd’s great West Indies team, is a delicious glimpse into the rosy past of a proud group of cricketing nations. The best thing about the documentary is that it is not a bunch of doddery old cricket historians talking about this dominant team in flowery language. The speakers are the very people whom the documentary is about, the players and to some extent the fans. Viv Richards and Michael Holding are the show-stealers, but Lloyd, Andy Roberts, Derryck Murray, Joel Garner, Colin Croft, Desmond Haynes, Gordon Greenidge all make an appearance. Add to that a bunch of truly eccentric characters like Bunny Wailer, Frank I, some Calypso artists and groundsmen, and the narration of the documentary is representative of the spirit of West Indies cricket in a way a historian or statistician could never have been. In fact, when one groundsman pronounces, “When West Indies lose, we cry tears maan”, you can’t help but be moved and wonder how many tears he must be shedding these days.And then of course there are those unforgettable images; Michael Holding with that graceful run-up, which was a thing of beauty to everyone other than the hapless batsman at the other end; Richards, helmetless and chewing gum, getting hit on the face by a bouncer, and hooking the very next ball for six; Malcolm Marshall bowling with a broken arm in a plaster and batting with one hand; That famous picture of Roberts, Holding, Croft and Garner together, the Horsemen of the Apocalypse; Each time a batsman had his jaws, nose, ribs, hands or other features rearranged – and there are plenty of such instances through the 88-minute documentary – the watcher is sure to wince, yet feel a visceral pleasure. One can only imagine what went through the minds of the batsmen themselves.Exhilarating as it is to watch, the documentary is not without its flaws. The cultural impact of the success of the West Indies team and cricket’s role in bringing together those independent countries in the Caribbean is undeniable. But the aspect of ‘Black Power’, the portrayal of the West Indian success as a payback for years of oppression by their colonial masters is a tad overplayed.Many players in the documentary talk about taking out their anger on the ball and the batsmen, but the fact is, no amount of anger can make a batsman play like Richards did at The Oval in 1976 or Greenidge did at Lord’s in 1984. They could play like that because they were supremely talented players, their skills honed by hours of practice. After all, when a batsman is facing a bowler bowling at 90mph, if he is thinking about the weight of history rather than the ball itself, it is hard to imagine him scoring any runs at all, forget about breaking records!You can try to find a higher political meaning in all events with the passage of time, but in this case, the documentary attempts to attribute the phenomenal success of the team to socio-political factors, rather than more believable ones like outstanding skills with bat and ball, and years of hard work. Ditto with the intimidating bowling. Throughout the documentary, fear and intimidation are a common theme. Batsmen are shown hopping all over the place to avoid bumpers, many are seen getting hit and poor old Brian Close, an elderly, but awfully brave English batsman is seen getting a thorough working over from Holding.Yet there was more to the West Indian attack than bouncers. Roberts was, in Sunil Gavaskar’s words, the cleverest fast bowler there ever was. When Holding took those 14 wickets on a featherbed of a track at the Oval in 1976, he did so by sending those batsmen to the pavilion, not to the hospital. In fact, a look at the scorecard of the particular match would tell you that of those 14 wickets, 12 were either bowled or LBW, suggesting a bowler targeting the stumps rather than batsmen’s heads. Marshall was not exactly a brainless brute either. He, along with Dennis Lillee, was probably the most complete fast bowler the game has ever seen. To the uninitiated, it would appear that the West Indian quicks were all about intimidation. But they were more, so much more.Also, the portrayal of the West Indies team before 1975 as ‘Calypso cricketers’, a bunch of players who could entertain but not win, was shocking. The tour of Australia in 1975-76, which resulted in a chastening 5-1 defeat, largely the handiwork of Dennis Lillee and Jeff Thompson, is said to have galvanized the team to come together, and go on to conquer everything there was there was to conquer on a cricket field. However, it must be noted that though West Indies became truly invincible under Lloyd, they had been winning more than they had been losing since the time of Frank Worrell, who doesn’t find more than a passing mention. The 1976 shellacking of England is said to be the ultimate triumph against their old colonial masters, when in fact, they had beaten England in England in 1963, 1966 and 1973 as well.A movie might be forgiven for taking dramatic liberties, a documentary cannot. However, for all its faults that might irk a knowledgeable cricket fan, the documentary still makes for delightful viewing. After all, when the subjects themselves are so fascinating, you hardly need to create drama. Sometimes true stories are enough to give you goosebumps..

Saker left frustrated as England fluff their lines

The inconsistency of England’s quick bowlers didn’t please the bowling coach as they allowed Tillakaratne Dilshan to hit 193

Andrew Miller at Lord's05-Jun-2011As the drizzle closed in during the afternoon session, there was plenty opportunity for Sky to trawl their archives, and one match in particular seemed pertinent to this situation. At The Oval in August 1998, England looked to have their destiny under control when they posted a hefty 445 in their first innings. A hard-hitting opener had other ideas, however, and once Sanath Jayasuriya had finished battering a stunned attack all across South East London, Sri Lanka had secured a first-innings lead of 146, and a day and a half to turn the screw.At that point, however, the analogy starts to peter out. No matter how much of a lead Sri Lanka may yet secure in this Test, and despite their astute selection of five bowlers, they lack the mesmeric genius of an individual such as Muttiah Muralitharan, while England – regardless of the setbacks they’ve suffered in the past few days – are batting with a confidence that surely would not permit such a meltdown. Nevertheless, weather permitting, there’s still enough time for England to face an awkward Cardiff-style final day, especially if they continue to ship their runs at close to four an over.It’s been a long old while since England bowled this badly in a Test match. Even at Brisbane in the opening Test of the Ashes, the 307-run stand between Michael Hussey and Brad Haddin was mitigated by an intense discipline that stretched their partnership across the best part of 100 overs. And this time last year, when Bangladesh’s Tamim Iqbal appeared at times to have England’s number, their unwavering faith in “the right areas” eventually sealed four Test wins out of four. At no stage in either series did England’s line of attack waver to the extent they did today, a fact that David Saker, their bowling coach, conceded at the close of play.”Over the last 12 to 18 months we’ve set extremely high standards, and over the last two days we’ve been nothing like those standards,” said Saker. “For the first time, I’d probably say there are some technical issues there. I’ve never seen this team bowl so many balls down the leg-side, and Matty Prior had a hell of a hard job over the last two days wicketkeeping to that. That’s usually a sign bowlers are falling over and not jumping straight enough through the crease. We might have to address those [issues].”The performance of Steven Finn has made for particularly painful viewing, not least for the England management who had trusted his temperament and potential, and backed him in this match to recover from his axing in the Ashes. Instead of slotting straight back into the zone, he served up arguably the most wayward performance by an England youngster since Liam Plunkett bowled himself out of Test cricket at Old Trafford in 2007, before his best spell of the match was curtailed by the rain.”Finny did a lot of good work with Kevin Shine and Richard Johnson after the Ashes, and came back and was looking really good – so we had no hesitation putting him in the team,” said Saker. “We thought he would do a really good job, and I think he was pretty anxious to do that after the Ashes Tests. But he showed some really good rhythm in that last hour – so we walked off the ground feeling a little bit more buoyant.”As in Plunkett’s case, however, Finn was not alone in his struggles, because his senior partners also forgot their side of the bargain. Steve Harmison had a shocker in that contest against West Indies four years ago, and today it was Stuart Broad who fluffed his lines – and lengths – as Tillakaratne Dilshan and Mahela Jayawardene clobbered him at close to five an over. Certainly there was none of the painstaking support that Broad had provided to James Anderson in that Gabba contest, when his 33 wicketless overs leaked just 72 runs all told.Anderson’s absence has been felt for so many reasons, but not for the ones that would have grabbed all the attention. His skiddier line of attack and movement both ways through the air and off the pitch might well have provided something else for Sri Lanka to think about, other than intermittent splice-rattlers from Chris Tremlett and his beanpole cohorts. But more importantly, his stump-to-stump discipline and control with the new ball are the factors that have really gone astray in this game.”What we usually have done is bowl well together, but we didn’t seem to do that, and that’s probably the most disappointing part,” said Saker. “We think we’ve got a really good crop of fast bowlers, not just here but back-up ready to slot in, but losing your leader with the ball is always going to be hard. Jimmy in particular has been outstanding. We expect him to bowl his first 16 overs for 30 runs, and that sets the scene for us to really attack with the other bowlers.”We’re hoping to get him back, but I don’t think we should be hiding behind Jimmy’s absence here,” he added. “We should be better than that. We set higher standards, and just to lose one player and bowl the way we did … I don’t think that’s excusable. The wicket was quite flat – we’ve scored 480 on it, so we knew it was going to be hard work. But we knew Dilshan was going to bat that way; we’ve seen enough of him to know that he can be a difficult man to get out and can take the game away from you really quickly.”Anderson has announced his readiness to return to action at the Rose Bowl, but between now and then England have two days in which to guard against further hiccups. There was a definite sign of improvement shortly before the weather closed in, as Tremlett squashed Dilshan’s thumb for the third time in the series before Finn followed up with a good-length ball to bowl him. But with their pride back intact after the horrors of Cardiff, Sri Lanka are unlikely to settle for anything less than a first-innings lead, especially with Jayawardene hunting his third century in as many trips to Lord’s.”We are a bit disappointed the rain has come here, otherwise there would definitely be a result in this match,” said Dilshan. “We need a result because we are already 1-0 down, and we came here to win, because there’s no point in coming for a draw. If it doesn’t rain, we [should] pass England’s score, bat one or two sessions tomorrow, get a lead of 100 to 150 runs, and put pressure on England’s batting.”It’s all a remarkable turnaround from the events of the start of the week in Cardiff, though Dilshan was proud to reiterate his faith in the players at his disposal. “You can’t say after 25 overs we are a bad batting line-up,” he said. “We have a lot of experience in Sanga, Mahela, Thilan [Samaraweera] and myself. Forget about everything that happened in Cardiff. We came here strong-minded and played our brand of cricket, and proved here we’re still strong enough to play good cricket. We’re really happy with the last two days.”Saker, understandably, was less chuffed, and admitted that the ease of the Cardiff win might have had some underlying effect on the attitude of his attack. “The danger for a cricketer is disrespecting the game,” he said. “When you have good days, you sometimes become lackadaisical. If you do that in this game, it has a habit of biting you on the bottom pretty quickly.”It’s more a sub-conscious thing,” he added. “When you’re bowling a side out for 80, you think it’s just going to happen again. Cricketers, and people in general sometimes, take things for granted. I don’t think we did that; I just thought our execution wasn’t as good as it has been, and the opposition played very well.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus